• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在与健康相关的计算机介导支持小组中,弱关系支持偏好和偏好的应对方式作为感知可信度的预测因素。

Weak tie support preference and preferred coping styles as predictors of perceived credibility within health-related computer-mediated support groups.

作者信息

Wright Kevin B, Rains Stephen A

机构信息

a Department of Communication , Saint Louis University.

出版信息

Health Commun. 2014;29(3):281-7. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2012.751084. Epub 2013 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1080/10410236.2012.751084
PMID:23790220
Abstract

Drawing upon an optimal matching model framework, this study examined weak tie support preference and coping style as predictors of credibility perceptions among members of health-related computer-mediated support groups. One hundred and thirty-five participants from various health-related online support groups responded to a survey questionnaire. The results indicated that increases in weak tie support network preference and problem-focused coping scores predicted increases in perceptions of credibility of online support group members. However, emotion-focused coping was not a significant predictor of perceived credibility. The implications of these findings for weak tie support network, coping, and credibility theories are discussed along with limitations of the study and directions for future research.

摘要

本研究借鉴最优匹配模型框架,考察了弱关系支持偏好和应对方式作为健康相关计算机介导支持小组成员可信度认知预测因素的情况。来自各种健康相关在线支持小组的135名参与者对一份调查问卷做出了回应。结果表明,弱关系支持网络偏好和以问题为中心的应对得分的增加预示着在线支持小组成员可信度认知的增加。然而,以情绪为中心的应对并不是感知可信度的显著预测因素。本文讨论了这些发现对弱关系支持网络、应对和可信度理论的意义,同时也讨论了研究的局限性和未来研究的方向。

相似文献

1
Weak tie support preference and preferred coping styles as predictors of perceived credibility within health-related computer-mediated support groups.在与健康相关的计算机介导支持小组中,弱关系支持偏好和偏好的应对方式作为感知可信度的预测因素。
Health Commun. 2014;29(3):281-7. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2012.751084. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
2
Psychosocial predictors of "safer sex" behaviors in young adults.青年成年人中“安全性行为”的社会心理预测因素
AIDS Educ Prev. 1992 Summer;4(2):120-34.
3
Perceived Stress in Online Prostate Cancer Community Participants: Examining Relationships with Stigmatization, Social Support Network Preference, and Social Support Seeking.在线前列腺癌社区参与者的感知压力:探究与污名化、社会支持网络偏好及社会支持寻求的关系
J Health Commun. 2017 Jun;22(6):469-476. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2017.1304471. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
4
I am proud and hopeful: age-based comparisons in positive coping affect among women who use online peer-support.我感到自豪和充满希望:使用在线同伴支持的女性中,基于年龄的积极应对方式的比较影响。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2011;29(5):573-91. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2011.599361.
5
Anger coping styles and perceived social support.愤怒应对方式与感知到的社会支持
J Soc Psychol. 1997 Aug;137(4):405-11. doi: 10.1080/00224549709595455.
6
Validity and reliability of the brief COPE in carers of people with dementia: the LASER-AD Study.简易应对方式问卷(Brief COPE)在痴呆症患者照料者中的效度和信度:LASER-AD研究
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008 Nov;196(11):838-43. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31818b504c.
7
Coping strategies from the perspective of two developmental markers: age and social reasoning.从两个发展标志的角度来看应对策略:年龄和社会推理。
J Genet Psychol. 1988 Jun;149(2):141-51. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1988.10532148.
8
Complete dentures and oral health-related quality of life -- do coping styles matter?全口义齿与口腔健康相关生活质量——应对方式重要吗?
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;32(4):297-306. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00169.x.
9
Outcome expectancy and success with cognitive-behavioral interventions: the case of guided imagery.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001 Aug;28(7):1125-32.
10
Social support and coping in Turkish patients with cancer.土耳其癌症患者的社会支持与应对方式
Cancer Nurs. 2007 Nov-Dec;30(6):498-504. doi: 10.1097/01.NCC.0000300158.60273.ba.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Transactional eHealth Literacy of Individuals With Cancer and Surrogate Information Seekers: Mixed Methods Study.比较癌症患者与替代信息寻求者的交易性电子健康素养:混合方法研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Sep 28;6(9):e36714. doi: 10.2196/36714.
2
Perceptions of the Diabetes Online Community's Credibility, Social Capital, and Help and Harm: Cross-Sectional Comparison Between Baby Boomers and Younger Adults.糖尿病在线社区的可信度、社会资本以及帮助与危害认知:婴儿潮一代与年轻成年人的横断面比较
JMIR Aging. 2019 Sep 26;2(2):e10857. doi: 10.2196/10857.