Emery Clifton R, Trung Hai Nguyen, Wu Shali
School of Social Welfare, Yonsei University, Republic of Korea; Department of Psychology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
School of Social Welfare, Yonsei University, Republic of Korea.
Child Abuse Negl. 2015 Mar;41:158-69. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
This paper introduces a new measure of informal social control of child maltreatment (henceforth ISC_CM) by neighbors. Research literature typically uses collective efficacy (Sampson, Raudenbush, & Earls, 1997) to examine neighborhood informal social control. We argue that double standards about the application of informal social control to family versus street crime requires a measure of informal social control specific to child maltreatment. We also argue that how neighbors intervene may matter as much as whether they intervene. Neighbors may engage in ISC_CM aimed at protecting the child and calming the parent, or more punitive ISC_CM aimed at deterring future abuse. We tested the relationship of both with very severe physical abuse and with abuse related child behavior problems. We used a random, 2-stage cluster design of Hanoi to collect the sample. Thirty Hanoi wards were randomly selected using probability proportional to size sampling. A simple random sample of families in each ward was then drawn using local government lists of ward residents. Based on power analysis, the target sample size was 300. Of 315 residents contacted, 293 participated, yielding a response rate of 93%. Random effects regression models (which estimate a random effect for each ward) were run in Stata11. We found that protective ISC_CM is associated with lower odds of very severe physical abuse and lower reported externalizing problems when abuse is present. Perceived collective efficacy and punitive ISC_CM is not associated with lower odds of very severe physical abuse. Implications for research, policy and practice are discussed. We conclude that further investigation of neighbor ISC_CM is needed to replicate the findings in other cultural contexts, ultimately followed by experimental manipulation of ISC_CM in a neighborhood context to examine the effects on child maltreatment. If further research corroborates the current findings, the development of neighborhood intervention programs to enhance protective ISC_CM may assist materially in reducing very severe child abuse and negative consequences stemming from such abuse.
本文介绍了一种衡量邻居对儿童虐待的非正式社会控制(以下简称ISC_CM)的新方法。研究文献通常使用集体效能感(桑普森、劳登布什和厄尔斯,1997年)来考察邻里间的非正式社会控制。我们认为,对家庭犯罪与街头犯罪应用非正式社会控制时存在双重标准,这就需要一种专门针对儿童虐待的非正式社会控制衡量方法。我们还认为,邻居干预的方式可能与他们是否进行干预同样重要。邻居可能会采取旨在保护儿童并安抚家长的ISC_CM措施,或者采取更具惩罚性的ISC_CM措施以威慑未来的虐待行为。我们测试了这两种措施与极其严重的身体虐待以及与虐待相关的儿童行为问题之间的关系。我们采用了河内的随机两阶段整群设计来收集样本。使用规模比例概率抽样法随机选取了30个河内街区。然后,利用当地政府的街区居民名单,在每个街区抽取了一个简单随机样本家庭。基于功效分析,目标样本量为300。在联系的315名居民中,293人参与了调查,回复率为93%。在Stata11中运行了随机效应回归模型(该模型估计每个街区的随机效应)。我们发现,保护性的ISC_CM与极其严重的身体虐待几率较低以及在存在虐待行为时报告的外化问题较少相关。感知到的集体效能感和惩罚性的ISC_CM与极其严重的身体虐待几率较低并无关联。文中讨论了对研究、政策和实践的启示。我们得出结论,需要进一步研究邻居的ISC_CM,以便在其他文化背景下复制这些发现,最终在邻里环境中对ISC_CM进行实验性操纵,以考察其对儿童虐待的影响。如果进一步的研究证实了当前的发现,那么制定邻里干预计划以增强保护性的ISC_CM可能会在很大程度上有助于减少极其严重的儿童虐待行为以及此类虐待行为产生的负面后果。