• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Linear energy transfer-guided optimization in intensity modulated proton therapy: feasibility study and clinical potential.线性能量传递引导的调强质子治疗优化:可行性研究和临床潜力。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Sep 1;87(1):216-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
2
Reoptimization of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans Based on Linear Energy Transfer.基于线性能量传递的调强质子治疗计划的重新优化
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Dec 1;96(5):1097-1106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.08.038. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
3
Introducing Proton Track-End Objectives in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Optimization to Reduce Linear Energy Transfer and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Critical Structures.在调强质子治疗优化中引入质子射程末端目标以降低关键结构中的线性能量传递和相对生物效应。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Mar 1;103(3):747-757. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.10.031. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
4
Variations in linear energy transfer within clinical proton therapy fields and the potential for biological treatment planning.临床质子治疗场中线性能量转移的变化及其在生物学治疗计划中的潜在应用。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Aug 1;80(5):1559-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.027. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
5
Robust intensity-modulated proton therapy to reduce high linear energy transfer in organs at risk.采用稳健的强度调制质子治疗以降低高线性能量转移的风险器官。
Med Phys. 2017 Dec;44(12):6138-6147. doi: 10.1002/mp.12610. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
6
Linear energy transfer incorporated intensity modulated proton therapy optimization.纳入线性能量传递的调强质子治疗优化。
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Dec 19;63(1):015013. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa9a2e.
7
Can We Advance Proton Therapy for Prostate? Considering Alternative Beam Angles and Relative Biological Effectiveness Variations When Comparing Against Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.我们能否推进前列腺质子治疗?在与调强放射治疗比较时,考虑替代射束角度和相对生物学效应的变化。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 1;95(1):454-464. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.01.018. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
8
Adaptive method for multicriteria optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy.强度调制质子治疗的多准则优化自适应方法。
Med Phys. 2018 Dec;45(12):5643-5652. doi: 10.1002/mp.13239. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
9
Improve the dosimetric outcome in bilateral head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy: a feasibility study.利用点扫描质子弧(SPArc)治疗改善双侧头颈部癌症(HNC)治疗的剂量学结果:一项可行性研究。
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jan 30;15(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-1476-9.
10
Can differences in linear energy transfer and thus relative biological effectiveness compromise the dosimetric advantage of intensity-modulated proton therapy as compared to passively scattered proton therapy?调强质子治疗与散射式质子治疗相比,线性能量传递的差异(即相对生物效应的差异)是否会影响调强质子治疗的剂量学优势?
Acta Oncol. 2018 Sep;57(9):1259-1264. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1468090. Epub 2018 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of dose calculation accuracy on inverse linear energy transfer optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.剂量计算准确性对调强质子治疗中反向线性能量传递优化的影响。
Precis Radiat Oncol. 2022 Dec 8;7(1):36-44. doi: 10.1002/pro6.1179. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Efficient proton transport modelling for proton beam therapy and biological quantification.用于质子束治疗和生物定量的高效质子传输建模。
J Math Biol. 2025 Apr 11;90(5):47. doi: 10.1007/s00285-025-02212-1.
3
Enabling clinical use of linear energy transfer in proton therapy for head and neck cancer - A review of implications for treatment planning and adverse events study.实现线性能量传递在头颈部癌质子治疗中的临床应用——对治疗计划和不良事件研究影响的综述
Vis Cancer Med. 2025;6. doi: 10.1051/vcm/2025001. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
4
Embracing the Future of Clinical Trials in Radiation Therapy: An NRG Oncology CIRO Technology Retreat Whitepaper on Pioneering Technologies and AI-Driven Solutions.拥抱放射治疗临床试验的未来:一份由NRG肿瘤学CIRO技术务虚会发布的关于开创性技术和人工智能驱动解决方案的白皮书。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2025 Jun 1;122(2):443-457. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.01.006. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
5
Balancing benefits and limitations of linear energy transfer optimization in carbon ion radiotherapy for large sacral chordomas.权衡碳离子放疗中针对大型骶骨脊索瘤进行线性能量传递优化的益处与局限性
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024 Aug 8;31:100624. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100624. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
NRG Oncology White Paper on the Relative Biological Effectiveness in Proton Therapy.NRG肿瘤学质子治疗相对生物效应白皮书。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2025 Jan 1;121(1):202-217. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.2152. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
7
Impact of Relative Biologic Effectiveness for Proton Therapy for Head and Neck and Skull-Base Tumors: A Technical and Clinical Review.质子治疗对头颈部及颅底肿瘤的相对生物效应影响:技术与临床综述
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 21;16(11):1947. doi: 10.3390/cancers16111947.
8
Biological optimization for hybrid proton-photon radiotherapy.质子-光子混合放射治疗的生物学优化。
Phys Med Biol. 2024 May 30;69(11). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad4d51.
9
Optimizing linear energy transfer distribution in intensity-modulated proton therapy using the alternating direction method of multipliers.使用乘子交替方向法优化调强质子治疗中的线性能量传递分布。
Front Oncol. 2024 Feb 28;14:1328147. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1328147. eCollection 2024.
10
Single high-energy arc proton therapy with Bragg peak boost (SHARP).单能超高压质子弧形治疗布喇格峰提升技术(SHARP)。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2024 Apr;71 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):27-36. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.769. Epub 2024 Feb 23.

本文引用的文献

1
TOPAS: an innovative proton Monte Carlo platform for research and clinical applications.TOPAS:用于研究和临床应用的创新质子蒙特卡罗平台。
Med Phys. 2012 Nov;39(11):6818-37. doi: 10.1118/1.4758060.
2
A model for the relative biological effectiveness of protons: the tissue specific parameter α/β of photons is a predictor for the sensitivity to LET changes.质子相对生物学效应模型:组织特异性参数α/β与光子相同,是预测对 LET 变化敏感性的指标。
Acta Oncol. 2013 Apr;52(3):580-8. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.705892. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
3
Range uncertainty in proton therapy due to variable biological effectiveness.由于生物学效应的变化,质子治疗中的范围不确定性。
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Mar 7;57(5):1159-72. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/5/1159. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
4
Variations in linear energy transfer within clinical proton therapy fields and the potential for biological treatment planning.临床质子治疗场中线性能量转移的变化及其在生物学治疗计划中的潜在应用。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Aug 1;80(5):1559-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.027. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
5
Dose to water versus dose to medium in proton beam therapy.质子束治疗中水体剂量与介质剂量对比
Phys Med Biol. 2009 Jul 21;54(14):4399-421. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/14/004. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
6
An approach for practical multiobjective IMRT treatment planning.一种实用的多目标调强放射治疗治疗计划方法。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Dec 1;69(5):1600-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.019. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
7
CERR: a computational environment for radiotherapy research.CERR:一种用于放射治疗研究的计算环境。
Med Phys. 2003 May;30(5):979-85. doi: 10.1118/1.1568978.
8
Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy.质子束治疗的相对生物效应(RBE)值。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Jun 1;53(2):407-21. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02754-2.

线性能量传递引导的调强质子治疗优化:可行性研究和临床潜力。

Linear energy transfer-guided optimization in intensity modulated proton therapy: feasibility study and clinical potential.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Sep 1;87(1):216-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.05.013
PMID:23790771
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4520412/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility and potential clinical benefit of linear energy transfer (LET) guided plan optimization in intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A multicriteria optimization (MCO) module was used to generate a series of Pareto-optimal IMPT base plans (BPs), corresponding to defined objectives, for 5 patients with head-and-neck cancer and 2 with pancreatic cancer. A Monte Carlo platform was used to calculate dose and LET distributions for each BP. A custom-designed MCO navigation module allowed the user to interpolate between BPs to produce deliverable Pareto-optimal solutions. Differences among the BPs were evaluated for each patient, based on dose-volume and LET-volume histograms and 3-dimensional distributions. An LET-based relative biological effectiveness (RBE) model was used to evaluate the potential clinical benefit when navigating the space of Pareto-optimal BPs.

RESULTS

The mean LET values for the target varied up to 30% among the BPs for the head-and-neck patients and up to 14% for the pancreatic cancer patients. Variations were more prominent in organs at risk (OARs), where mean LET values differed by a factor of up to 2 among the BPs for the same patient. An inverse relation between dose and LET distributions for the OARs was typically observed. Accounting for LET-dependent variable RBE values, a potential improvement on RBE-weighted dose of up to 40%, averaged over several structures under study, was noticed during MCO navigation.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a novel strategy for optimizing proton therapy to maximize dose-averaged LET in tumor targets while simultaneously minimizing dose-averaged LET in normal tissue structures. MCO BPs show substantial LET variations, leading to potentially significant differences in RBE-weighted doses. Pareto-surface navigation, using both dose and LET distributions for guidance, provides the means for evaluating a large variety of deliverable plans and aids in identifying the clinically optimal solution.

摘要

目的

研究线性能量转移(LET)引导的计划优化在强度调制质子治疗(IMPT)中的可行性和潜在临床获益。

方法和材料

使用多标准优化(MCO)模块为 5 例头颈部癌症和 2 例胰腺癌患者生成一系列定义目标的帕累托最优 IMPT 基础计划(BP)。使用蒙特卡罗平台计算每个 BP 的剂量和 LET 分布。定制的 MCO 导航模块允许用户在 BP 之间进行插值,以生成可交付的帕累托最优解决方案。基于剂量-体积和 LET-体积直方图以及三维分布,评估每个患者 BP 之间的差异。使用基于 LET 的相对生物效应(RBE)模型评估在导航帕累托最优 BP 空间时的潜在临床获益。

结果

对于头颈部患者,BP 之间的靶区平均 LET 值变化高达 30%,对于胰腺癌患者,BP 之间的平均 LET 值变化高达 14%。在危及器官(OARs)中变化更为明显,同一患者的 BP 之间的平均 LET 值差异高达 2 倍。通常观察到 OARs 的剂量和 LET 分布之间存在反比关系。考虑到 LET 依赖性可变 RBE 值,在 MCO 导航过程中,在几个研究结构上,RBE 加权剂量平均提高了 40%。

结论

我们提出了一种优化质子治疗的新策略,以最大化肿瘤靶区的平均剂量-averaged LET,同时最小化正常组织结构的平均剂量-averaged LET。MCO BP 显示出显著的 LET 变化,导致 RBE 加权剂量可能存在显著差异。使用剂量和 LET 分布进行引导的帕累托表面导航提供了评估多种可交付计划的手段,并有助于确定临床最佳解决方案。