Cook Chad, Learman Ken, Houghton Steve, Showalter Christopher, O'Halloran Bryan
Division of Physical Therapy, Walsh University, 2020 East Maple Street, North Canton, OH 44720, USA.
Division of Physical Therapy, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH, USA.
Man Ther. 2014 Feb;19(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
Shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) is a complex, multi-factorial problem that is treated with a variety of different conservative options. One conservative option that has shown effectiveness is manual therapy to the thoracic spine. Another option, manual therapy to the cervical spine, has been studied only once with good results, evaluating short-term outcomes, in a small sample size. The purpose of this study was to investigate the benefit of neck manual therapy for patients with SIS. The study was a randomised, single blinded, clinical trial where both groups received pragmatic, evidence-based treatment to the shoulder and one group received neck manual therapy. Subjects with neck pain were excluded from the study. Comparative pain, disability, rate of recovery and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) measures were analyzed on the 68 subjects seen over an average of 56.1 days (standard deviation (SD)=55.4). Eighty-six percent of the sample reported an acceptable change on the PASS at discharge. There were no between-groups differences in those who did or did not receive neck manual therapy; however, both groups demonstrated significant within-groups improvements. On average both groups improved 59.7% (SD=25.1) for pain and 53.5% (SD=40.2) for the Quick Disabilities of the Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) from baseline. This study found no value when neck manual therapy was added to the treatment of SIS. Reasons may include the lack of therapeutic dosage provided for the manual therapy approach or the lack of benefit to treating the neck in subjects with SIS who do not have concomitant neck problems.
肩部撞击综合征(SIS)是一个复杂的、多因素问题,可通过多种不同的保守治疗方法进行治疗。一种已显示出有效性的保守治疗方法是对胸椎进行手法治疗。另一种方法,即对颈椎进行手法治疗,仅在一项针对小样本量的短期疗效评估研究中有过良好结果。本研究的目的是调查颈部手法治疗对SIS患者的益处。该研究是一项随机、单盲临床试验,两组均接受基于证据的肩部实用治疗,其中一组接受颈部手法治疗。颈部疼痛的受试者被排除在研究之外。对68名平均随访56.1天(标准差(SD)=55.4)的受试者的疼痛、功能障碍、恢复率和患者可接受症状状态(PASS)指标进行了分析。86%的样本在出院时报告PASS有可接受的变化。接受或未接受颈部手法治疗的患者在组间无差异;然而,两组在组内均有显著改善。平均而言,两组的疼痛从基线水平改善了59.7%(SD=25.1),肩部和手部功能障碍快速问卷(QuickDASH)改善了53.5%(SD=40.2)。本研究发现,在SIS治疗中增加颈部手法治疗并无价值。原因可能包括手法治疗方法缺乏治疗剂量,或者对于没有并发颈部问题的SIS患者,治疗颈部没有益处。