• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Clindamycin and cloxacillin compared in the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections.

作者信息

Pusponegoro E H, Wiryadi B E

机构信息

Department of Dermato-Venereology, Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1990 May-Jun;12(3):236-41.

PMID:2379228
Abstract

The subjects were 61 patients with skin or soft-tissue infections treated at the Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital in Jakarta, Indonesia. The patients, aged 15 to 59 years (40 females, 21 males), were randomly assigned to receive 300 mg of clindamycin or 500 mg of cloxacillin orally thrice daily for seven days. On day 8, the infections were cured in seven of the 31 clindamycin-treated patients and in three of the 30 cloxacillin-treated patients; on day 15, 27 of the clindamycin group and 18 of the cloxacillin group were cured; four clindamycin-treated patients and 11 cloxacillin-treated patients were improved; and one cloxacillin-treated patient failed. The between-group differences were not statistically significant. Pretreatment positive cultures were obtained in 40 patients, including Staphylococcus aureus in 24, group A beta-hemolytic streptococci in five, and a combination of S aureus and beta-hemolytic streptococci in four. Side effects were reported by three clindamycin-treated patients (gastric upset, nausea, and headache) and one cloxacillin-treated patient (nausea). Abnormal changes in laboratory test results from before to after treatment were noted in both patient groups and were probably not attributable to either drug. It is concluded that clindamycin is a safe and effective agent in the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections.

摘要

相似文献

1
Clindamycin and cloxacillin compared in the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections.
Clin Ther. 1990 May-Jun;12(3):236-41.
2
Clindamycin versus ampicillin in the treatment of odontogenic infections.克林霉素与氨苄西林治疗牙源性感染的对比
Clin Ther. 1990 May-Jun;12(3):242-9.
3
Oral clindamycin 300 mg BID compared with oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 1 g BID in the outpatient treatment of acute recurrent pharyngotonsillitis caused by group a beta-hemolytic streptococci: an international, multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded, prospective trial in patients between the ages of 12 and 60 years.口服克林霉素300毫克,每日两次,与口服阿莫西林/克拉维酸1克,每日两次,用于门诊治疗由A组β溶血性链球菌引起的急性复发性咽扁桃体炎:一项针对12至60岁患者的国际、多中心、随机、研究者设盲的前瞻性试验。
Clin Ther. 2006 Jan;28(1):99-109. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.01.006.
4
Ofloxacin versus cephalexin in the treatment of skin, skin structure, and soft-tissue infections in adults.氧氟沙星与头孢氨苄治疗成人皮肤、皮肤结构及软组织感染的比较
Clin Ther. 1991 Nov-Dec;13(6):727-36.
5
Empiric antimicrobial therapy for pediatric skin and soft-tissue infections in the era of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌时代小儿皮肤和软组织感染的经验性抗菌治疗
Pediatrics. 2009 Jun;123(6):e959-66. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2428. Epub 2009 May 26.
6
[Clinical evaluation of the effects of flucloxacillin in skin and soft tissue infections in the Ivory Coast].
Pharmatherapeutica. 1988;5(3):193-7.
7
Twice-daily moxalactam versus gentamicin and clindamycin in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma.腹部穿透伤患者中,每日两次使用莫西拉坦与庆大霉素和克林霉素的对比研究。
Clin Pharm. 1985 May-Jun;4(3):316-20.
8
Clindamycin versus cloxacillin in the treatment of 240 open fractures. A randomized prospective study.克林霉素与氯唑西林治疗240例开放性骨折的随机前瞻性研究
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1998;87(3):224-8.
9
Clindamycin versus metronidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis.
Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Nov;72(5):799-802.
10
Results of the North American trial of piperacillin/tazobactam compared with clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections. Investigators of the Piperacillin/Tazobactam Intra-abdominal Infection Study Group.北美哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与克林霉素和庆大霉素治疗严重腹腔内感染的试验结果。哌拉西林/他唑巴坦腹腔内感染研究组的研究人员。
Eur J Surg Suppl. 1994(573):61-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing a penicillin or cephalosporin with a macrolide or lincosamide in the treatment of cellulitis or erysipelas.青霉素或头孢菌素与大环内酯类或林可酰胺类抗生素治疗蜂窝织炎或丹毒的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Infection. 2016 Oct;44(5):607-15. doi: 10.1007/s15010-016-0895-x. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
2
Interventions for impetigo.脓疱病的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD003261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003261.pub3.