• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

克林霉素与氨苄西林治疗牙源性感染的对比

Clindamycin versus ampicillin in the treatment of odontogenic infections.

作者信息

Mangundjaja S, Hardjawinata K

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1990 May-Jun;12(3):242-9.

PMID:2379229
Abstract

The subjects were 106 patients, aged 14 to 70 years, with acute facial or oral abscesses originating from an odontogenic source. They were randomly assigned to receive 150 mg of clindamycin or 250 mg of ampicillin orally four times daily for seven days. After seven days of treatment, the infections were eradicated in 36 of the 52 clindamycin-treated patients and in 42 of the 54 ampicillin-treated patients, and improved in 16 and 11, respectively. One of the ampicillin group was a treatment failure. Mixed bacterial infections were found in most of the patients; 385 isolates were identified, 167 aerobes and 218 anaerobes. The most common aerobes were Staphylococcus aureus (in 58 patients), Staphylococcus epidermidis (in 47), and Staphylococcus viridans (in 32); the most common anaerobes were species of Peptococcus (in 76), Bacteroides (in 38), and Peptostreptococcus (in 33). No isolates were resistant to clindamycin; nine of 126 aerobes and six of 160 anaerobes were resistant to ampicillin. It is concluded that clindamycin is a safe and effective alternative antibiotic in the treatment of odontogenic infections.

摘要

研究对象为106例年龄在14至70岁之间、患有源自牙源性的急性面部或口腔脓肿的患者。他们被随机分配,分别接受每日4次、每次口服150毫克克林霉素或250毫克氨苄西林的治疗,疗程为7天。治疗7天后,52例接受克林霉素治疗的患者中有36例感染得到根除,54例接受氨苄西林治疗的患者中有42例感染得到根除,另有16例和11例患者的感染分别有所改善。氨苄西林组中有1例治疗失败。大多数患者存在混合细菌感染;共鉴定出385株分离菌,其中167株为需氧菌,218株为厌氧菌。最常见的需氧菌是金黄色葡萄球菌(58例患者中分离出)、表皮葡萄球菌(47例)和草绿色链球菌(32例);最常见的厌氧菌是消化球菌属(76例)、拟杆菌属(38例)和消化链球菌属(33例)。没有分离菌对克林霉素耐药;126株需氧菌中有9株、160株厌氧菌中有6株对氨苄西林耐药。结论是,克林霉素是治疗牙源性感染的一种安全有效的替代抗生素。

相似文献

1
Clindamycin versus ampicillin in the treatment of odontogenic infections.克林霉素与氨苄西林治疗牙源性感染的对比
Clin Ther. 1990 May-Jun;12(3):242-9.
2
[Bacterial and management of orofacial abscesses--penicillin versus clindamycin].
Z Stomatol. 1988 May;85(3):179-89.
3
Clindamycin versus Unasyn in the treatment of facial cellulitis of odontogenic origin in children.克林霉素与优立新治疗儿童牙源性面部蜂窝织炎的对比研究
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2007 Mar;46(2):154-9. doi: 10.1177/0009922806289431.
4
Severe versus local odontogenic bacterial infections: comparison of microbial isolates.严重与局部牙源性细菌感染:微生物分离株的比较
Eur Surg Res. 2008;40(2):220-4. doi: 10.1159/000110864. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
5
Penicillin compared with other advanced broad spectrum antibiotics regarding antibacterial activity against oral pathogens isolated from odontogenic abscesses.将青霉素与其他先进的广谱抗生素在针对从牙源性脓肿分离出的口腔病原体的抗菌活性方面进行比较。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008 Dec;36(8):462-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Aug 29.
6
Bacteriologic features and antimicrobial susceptibility in isolates from orofacial odontogenic infections.口腔颌面部牙源性感染分离株的细菌学特征及药敏情况
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000 Nov;90(5):600-8. doi: 10.1067/moe.2000.109639.
7
[Bacterial spectra and antibiotics in odontogenic infections. Renaissance of the penicillins?].[牙源性感染中的细菌谱与抗生素。青霉素的复兴?]
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2005 Nov;9(6):377-83. doi: 10.1007/s10006-005-0646-0.
8
Clindamycin and cloxacillin compared in the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections.
Clin Ther. 1990 May-Jun;12(3):236-41.
9
A randomized controlled trial of ampicillin plus sulbactam vs. gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of intraabdominal infections: a preliminary report. Study Group of Intraabdominal Infections.氨苄西林加舒巴坦与庆大霉素加克林霉素治疗腹腔内感染的随机对照试验:初步报告。腹腔内感染研究组
Rev Infect Dis. 1986 Nov-Dec;8 Suppl 5:S583-8.
10
Microbiological analysis of a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial comparing moxifloxacin and clindamycin in the treatment of odontogenic infiltrates and abscesses.一项前瞻性、随机、双盲临床试验的微生物分析,比较莫西沙星和克林霉素治疗牙源性浸润和脓肿的效果。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 May;56(5):2565-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.06428-11. Epub 2012 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid for the Treatment of Odontogenic Infections: A Randomised Study Comparing Efficacy and Tolerability versus Clindamycin.阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗牙源性感染:一项比较其与克林霉素疗效及耐受性的随机研究
Int J Dent. 2015;2015:472470. doi: 10.1155/2015/472470. Epub 2015 Aug 2.
2
Dental abscess: A microbiological review.牙脓肿:微生物学综述
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013 Sep;10(5):585-91.