Department of Oncology, Regional Centre for Excellence in Palliative Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
BMJ Open. 2013 May 31;3(5):e002515. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002515.
Patients with advanced cancer are often admitted to hospital as emergency cases. This may not always be medically indicated. Study objectives were to register the reasons for the emergency admissions, to examine interventions performed during hospitalisation and self-reported symptom intensity at admission and discharge, and to assess patients' opinions about the admission.
This was a descriptive before-and-after study. Participating patients completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) twice, upon hospital admission and prior to discharge. All patients underwent a structured interview assessing their opinion about the emergency admission. Medical data were obtained from the hospital records.
The study was performed in two Norwegian acute care secondary hospitals with urban catchment areas.
44 patients with cancer (men 27 and women 17; mean age 69.2, SD 9.2) representing 50 emergency admissions were included.
Median length of stay was 7 days (95% CI 7.4 to 11.4). Median survival was 50 days (95% CI 51 to 115). 90% were admitted from home, and 46% had been hospitalised less than 1 month earlier. Lung and gastrointestinal symptoms and pain were the most frequent reasons for admissions. Mean pain scores on ESAS were reduced by 50% from admission to discharge (p<0.01). Simple interventions such as hydration, bladder catheterisation and oxygen therapy were most frequent. Nearly one-third would have preferred treatment at another site, provided that the quality of care was similar. Home visits by the family doctor and specialised care teams were perceived by patients as important to prevent hospitalisation.
In most emergency admissions, relatively simple medical interventions are necessary. Specialised care teams with palliative care physicians, easier access to the family doctor and better lines of cooperation between hospitals and the primary care sector may make it possible to perform more of these procedures at home, thereby reducing the need for emergency admissions.
晚期癌症患者经常作为急症入院。但这并不总是医学指征。本研究的目的是记录急症入院的原因,检查住院期间的干预措施以及入院和出院时的自我报告症状强度,并评估患者对入院的看法。
这是一项描述性的前后对照研究。参与患者在入院时和出院前两次完成埃德蒙顿症状评估系统(ESAS),所有患者均接受了一项评估他们对急症入院看法的结构化访谈。从医院记录中获得医疗数据。
该研究在两家具有城市覆盖范围的挪威急性二级保健医院进行。
44 名癌症患者(男性 27 名,女性 17 名;平均年龄 69.2 岁,标准差 9.2)代表 50 次急症入院。
中位住院时间为 7 天(95%CI 7.4-11.4)。中位生存时间为 50 天(95%CI 51-115)。90%从家中入院,46%在入院前不到 1 个月内曾住院。肺部和胃肠道症状以及疼痛是最常见的入院原因。ESAS 的平均疼痛评分从入院时到出院时降低了 50%(p<0.01)。最常见的干预措施是补液、导尿和吸氧等简单干预。近三分之一的患者希望在另一个地点接受治疗,前提是护理质量相似。患者认为家庭医生和专科护理团队的家访对防止住院很重要。
在大多数急症入院中,需要进行相对简单的医疗干预。配备姑息治疗医生的专科护理团队、更容易获得家庭医生以及改善医院与初级保健部门之间的合作关系,可能使更多的这些程序能够在家中进行,从而减少急症入院的需求。