Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, ML 0769, MSB 1654, Cincinnati, OH, 45206, USA,
J Med Toxicol. 2013 Sep;9(3):235-41. doi: 10.1007/s13181-013-0310-2.
The availability of 20-h N-acetylcysteine (NAC) infusion for low-risk acetaminophen (APAP) overdose enabled our center to implement an Emergency Department observation unit (OU) protocol as an alternative to hospitalization. Our objective was to evaluate our early experience with this protocol. This retrospective cohort study included all patients treated for low-risk APAP overdose in our academic hospital between 2006 and 2011. Cases were identified using OU and pharmacy records. Successful OU discharge was defined as disposition with no inpatient admission. Differences in medians with 95 % confidence intervals were used for comparisons. One hundred ninety-six patients received NAC for APAP overdose with a mean age of 35 years (SD 14); 73 % were white, and 43 % were male. Twenty (10 %) received care in the OU; 3/20(15 %) met criteria for inclusion in the OU protocol and 13/20(65 %) were discharged successfully. Out of the 196 patients, 10 met criteria for inclusion in the OU protocol but instead received care in the inpatient setting. The median total length of stay from presentation to ED discharge was 41 h for all patients treated in the OU, compared to 68 h for ten patients who met criteria for inclusion in the OU protocol but who were admitted (difference 27 h, 95 % CI 18-72 h). ED observation for APAP overdose can be a viable alternative to inpatient admission. Most patients were successfully discharged from the OU. This evaluation identified both over- and under-utilization of the OU. OU treatment resulted in shorter median length of stay than inpatient admission.
20 小时 N-乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)输液的应用使我们中心能够实施急诊科观察单元(OU)方案,作为低风险对乙酰氨基酚(APAP)过量的替代治疗。我们的目标是评估该方案的早期经验。这项回顾性队列研究包括了我们学术医院在 2006 年至 2011 年间治疗的所有低风险 APAP 过量的患者。病例是通过 OU 和药房记录确定的。成功的 OU 出院定义为无住院治疗的出院。使用 95%置信区间的中位数差异进行比较。196 例患者因 APAP 过量接受 NAC 治疗,平均年龄 35 岁(标准差 14 岁);73%为白人,43%为男性。20 例(10%)在 OU 接受治疗;3/20(15%)符合 OU 方案纳入标准,13/20(65%)成功出院。在 196 例患者中,有 10 例符合 OU 方案纳入标准,但在住院患者中接受治疗。所有在 OU 治疗的患者从急诊科出院的总住院时间中位数为 41 小时,而 10 例符合 OU 方案纳入标准但住院的患者的中位数为 68 小时(差异为 27 小时,95%CI 18-72 小时)。APAP 过量的急诊科观察可以作为住院治疗的可行替代方案。大多数患者成功从 OU 出院。这项评估发现 OU 的使用存在过度和不足的情况。OU 治疗的中位住院时间短于住院治疗。