• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量儿童癌症护理提供系统的质量:质量指标的制定。

Measuring the quality of a childhood cancer care delivery system: quality indicator development.

机构信息

Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario (POGO), Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):647-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.03.1627.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2013.03.1627
PMID:23796300
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A set of indicators to assess the quality of a childhood cancer system has not been identified in any jurisdiction internationally, despite the movement toward increased accountability and provision of high-quality care with limited health care resources. This study was conducted to develop a set of quality indicators (QIs) of a childhood cancer control and health care delivery system in Ontario, Canada.

METHODS

A systematic review and targeted gray literature search were conducted to identify potential childhood cancer QIs. A series of investigator focus group sessions followed to review all QIs identified in the literature, and to generate a provisional QI set for a childhood cancer system. QIs were evaluated by three content experts in a sequential selection process on the basis of a series of criteria to select a subset for presentation to stakeholders. Following an appraisal of the relevance of quality assessment frameworks, remaining QIs were mapped onto the Cancer System Quality Index framework.

RESULTS

The systematic review yielded few relevant childhood cancer system QIs. Overall, 120 provisional QIs were developed by the investigator group. Based on median QI rating scores, representation across the childhood cancer continuum, and feasibility of data collection, a subset of 33 QIs was selected for stakeholder consideration.

CONCLUSIONS

The subset of 33 QIs developed on the basis of a systematic literature review and consensus provides the basis for the selection of a set of QIs for ongoing, standardized monitoring of various dimensions of quality in a childhood cancer system.

摘要

目的

尽管在有限的医疗资源下,提高医疗责任制和提供高质量的医疗服务已成为一种趋势,但在国际上任何司法管辖区都尚未确定一套用于评估儿童癌症系统质量的指标。本研究旨在制定加拿大安大略省儿童癌症控制和医疗服务提供系统的一套质量指标 (QIs)。

方法

进行了系统评价和有针对性的灰色文献搜索,以确定潜在的儿童癌症 QIs。随后进行了一系列调查员焦点小组会议,以审查文献中确定的所有 QIs,并为儿童癌症系统生成一个暂定的 QI 集。质量专家根据一系列标准,在顺序选择过程中对 QIs 进行评估,以选择一组提交给利益相关者。在评估质量评估框架的相关性之后,剩余的 QIs 被映射到癌症系统质量指数框架上。

结果

系统评价仅产生了一些相关的儿童癌症系统 QIs。总体而言,调查员小组制定了 120 个暂定 QIs。基于中位数 QI 评分、儿童癌症连续体的代表性以及数据收集的可行性,选择了 33 个 QIs 作为利益相关者考虑的子集。

结论

基于系统文献综述和共识制定的 33 个 QIs 子集为选择一组 QIs 提供了基础,用于持续、标准化地监测儿童癌症系统各个方面的质量。

相似文献

1
Measuring the quality of a childhood cancer care delivery system: quality indicator development.测量儿童癌症护理提供系统的质量:质量指标的制定。
Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):647-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.03.1627.
2
Consensus-based development and practice testing of a generic quality indicator set for parenteral medication administration at home: a RAND appropriateness method study.基于共识的居家肠外给药通用质量指标集的开发与实践测试:一项兰德适宜性方法研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 1;15(7):e090496. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090496.
3
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
4
Quality assessment of diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of infectious diseases in primary care: a systematic review of quality indicators.基层医疗中传染病诊断与抗生素治疗的质量评估:质量指标的系统评价
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016 Sep;34(3):258-66. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2016.1207143. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
5
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
6
Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer.针对儿童癌症治疗期间及治疗后的儿童和青少年的体育锻炼训练干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30(4):CD008796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008796.pub2.
7
Quality indicators for musculoskeletal injury management in the emergency department: a systematic review.急诊科肌肉骨骼损伤管理的质量指标:一项系统综述
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Feb;22(2):127-41. doi: 10.1111/acem.12591. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
8
Quality indicators for community care for older people: A systematic review.老年人社区护理质量指标:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 9;13(1):e0190298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190298. eCollection 2018.
9
Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer.针对儿童癌症治疗期间及治疗后的儿童和青少年的体育锻炼训练干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 31;3(3):CD008796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008796.pub3.
10
Quality indicators for home- and community-based aged care: A critical literature review to inform policy directions.居家和社区养老服务质量指标:为制定政策方向提供重要文献综述。
Australas J Ageing. 2022 Sep;41(3):383-395. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13103. Epub 2022 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Monitoring of prostate cancer screening in the European Union: development of key performance indicators through the PRAISE-U project.欧盟前列腺癌筛查监测:通过PRAISE-U项目制定关键绩效指标
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jan 23;80:103022. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103022. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Quality criteria and certification for paediatric oncology centres: an international cross-sectional survey.儿科肿瘤中心的质量标准和认证:一项国际横断面调查。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 Aug 30;36(3). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae079.
3
Quality criteria for pediatric oncology centers: A systematic literature review.
儿科肿瘤中心的质量标准:系统文献回顾。
Cancer Med. 2023 Sep;12(18):18999-19012. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6452. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
4
Establishing nursing-sensitive quality indicators for pediatric oncology: An international mixed methods Delphi study.建立儿科肿瘤护理敏感质量指标:一项国际混合方法德尔菲研究。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023 Jan;55(1):388-400. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12798. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
5
Monitoring and evaluation of breast cancer screening programmes: selecting candidate performance indicators.乳腺癌筛查项目的监测和评估:选择候选绩效指标。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug 24;20(1):795. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07289-z.
6
Quality and capacity indicators for hospitalized pediatric oncology patients with critical illness: A modified delphi consensus.危重症住院儿科肿瘤患者的质量和能力指标:一项改良 Delphi 共识。
Cancer Med. 2020 Oct;9(19):6984-6995. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3351. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
7
The Evolution of Radiation Therapy for Retinoblastoma: The MD Anderson Cancer Center Experience.视网膜母细胞瘤放射治疗的演变:MD安德森癌症中心的经验
Int J Part Ther. 2016 Mar;2(4):490-498. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-15-00016.1. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
8
Improving the quality of care in the molecular era for children and adolescents with medulloblastoma.提高分子时代儿童和青少年髓母细胞瘤的护理质量。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2019 Dec;21(12):1687-1698. doi: 10.1007/s12094-019-02101-2. Epub 2019 Apr 1.