Suppr超能文献

老年人社区护理质量指标:一项系统综述。

Quality indicators for community care for older people: A systematic review.

作者信息

Joling Karlijn J, van Eenoo Liza, Vetrano Davide L, Smaardijk Veerle R, Declercq Anja, Onder Graziano, van Hout Hein P J, van der Roest Henriëtte G

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

LUCAS, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Jan 9;13(1):e0190298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190298. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health care systems that succeed in preventing long term care and hospital admissions of frail older people may substantially save on their public spending. The key might be found in high-quality care in the community. Quality Indicators (QIs) of a sufficient methodological level are a prerequisite to monitor, compare, and improve care quality. This systematic review identified existing QIs for community care for older people and assessed their methodological quality.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified by searches in electronic reference databases and selected by two reviewers independently. Eligible publications described the development or application of QIs to assess the quality of community care for older people. Information about the QIs, the study sample, and specific setting was extracted. The methodological quality of the QI sets was assessed with the Appraisal of Indicators through Research and Evaluation (AIRE) instrument. A score of 50% or higher on a domain was considered to indicate high methodological quality.

RESULTS

Searches resulted in 25 included articles, describing 17 QI sets with 567 QIs. Most indicators referred to care processes (80%) and measured clinical issues (63%), mainly about follow-up, monitoring, examinations and treatment. About two-third of the QIs focussed on specific disease groups. The methodological quality of the indicator sets varied considerably. The highest overall level was achieved on the domain 'Additional evidence, formulation and usage' (51%), followed by 'Scientific evidence' (39%) and 'Stakeholder involvement' (28%).

CONCLUSION

A substantial number of QIs is available to assess the quality of community care for older people. However, generic QIs, measuring care outcomes and non-clinical aspects are relatively scarce and most QI sets do not meet standards of high methodological quality. This study can support policy makers and clinicians to navigate through a large number of QIs and select QIs for their purposes. PROSPERO Registration: 2014:CRD42014007199.

摘要

背景

成功预防体弱老年人长期护理和住院的医疗保健系统可能会大幅节省公共开支。关键或许在于社区的高质量护理。具备足够方法学水平的质量指标(QIs)是监测、比较和提高护理质量的先决条件。本系统评价确定了现有的老年人社区护理质量指标,并评估了其方法学质量。

方法

通过在电子参考数据库中检索来识别相关研究,并由两位评审员独立筛选。符合条件的出版物描述了用于评估老年人社区护理质量的质量指标的制定或应用。提取了有关质量指标、研究样本和具体环境的信息。使用研究与评估指标评估(AIRE)工具对质量指标集的方法学质量进行评估。一个领域得分达到50%或更高被认为表明方法学质量高。

结果

检索结果纳入了25篇文章,描述了17个质量指标集,共567个质量指标。大多数指标涉及护理过程(80%),并衡量临床问题(63%),主要是关于随访、监测、检查和治疗。约三分之二的质量指标聚焦于特定疾病组。指标集的方法学质量差异很大。在“额外证据、制定和使用”领域达到了最高总体水平(51%),其次是“科学证据”(39%)和“利益相关者参与”(28%)。

结论

有大量质量指标可用于评估老年人社区护理质量。然而,衡量护理结果和非临床方面的通用质量指标相对较少,且大多数质量指标集未达到高方法学质量标准。本研究可为政策制定者和临床医生在大量质量指标中进行筛选并根据自身目的选择质量指标提供支持。国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册号:2014:CRD42014007199。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50e6/5760020/952c1c969811/pone.0190298.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验