Suppr超能文献

糖尿病及其并发症的计算机建模:第五届胡德山挑战赛会议报告。

Computer modeling of diabetes and its complications: a report on the Fifth Mount Hood challenge meeting.

机构信息

Menzies Research Institute Tasmania, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.

出版信息

Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):670-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.01.002. Epub 2013 Apr 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Mount Hood Challenge meetings provide a forum for computer modelers of diabetes to discuss and compare models, to assess predictions against data from clinical trials and other studies, and to identify key future developments in the field. This article reports the proceedings of the Fifth Mount Hood Challenge in 2010.

METHODS

Eight modeling groups participated. Each group was given four modeling challenges to perform (in type 2 diabetes): to simulate a trial of a lipid-lowering intervention (The Atorvastatin Study for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Endpoints in Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus [ASPEN]), to simulate a trial of a blood glucose-lowering intervention (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation [ADVANCE]), to simulate a trial of a blood pressure-lowering intervention (Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes [ACCORD]), and (optional) to simulate a second trial of blood glucose-lowering therapy (ACCORD). Model outcomes for each challenge were compared with the published findings of the respective trials.

RESULTS

The results of the models varied from each other and, in some cases, from the published trial data in important ways. In general, the models performed well in terms of predicting the relative benefit of interventions, but performed less well in terms of quantifying the absolute risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methodological challenges were highlighted including matching trial end-point definitions, the importance of assumptions concerning the progression of risk factors over time, and accurately matching the patient characteristics from each trial.

CONCLUSIONS

The Fifth Mount Hood Challenge allowed modelers, through systematic comparison and validation exercises, to identify important differences between models, address key methodological challenges, and discuss avenues of research to improve future diabetes models.

摘要

目的

胡德山挑战赛会议为糖尿病计算机建模者提供了一个讨论和比较模型的论坛,以评估临床试验和其他研究数据的预测,并确定该领域的关键未来发展。本文报告了 2010 年第五届胡德山挑战赛的会议记录。

方法

有八个建模小组参加。每个小组都有四项建模挑战(在 2 型糖尿病中):模拟降脂干预试验(阿托伐他汀治疗非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病预防冠心病终点研究[ASPEN]),模拟血糖降低干预试验(糖尿病和血管疾病的行动:培哚普利和二甲双胍缓释片对照评估[ADVANCE]),模拟降压干预试验(糖尿病心血管风险[ACCORD]),以及(可选)模拟第二次血糖降低治疗试验(ACCORD)。每个挑战的模型结果都与各自试验的已发表结果进行了比较。

结果

模型的结果彼此不同,在某些情况下,与已发表的试验数据在重要方面也不同。一般来说,这些模型在预测干预的相对益处方面表现良好,但在量化 2 型糖尿病患者并发症的绝对风险方面表现不佳。突出强调了方法学方面的挑战,包括匹配试验终点定义、随着时间推移对风险因素进展的假设的重要性,以及准确匹配每个试验的患者特征。

结论

第五届胡德山挑战赛使建模者能够通过系统的比较和验证练习,确定模型之间的重要差异,解决关键的方法学挑战,并讨论改善未来糖尿病模型的研究途径。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验