Suppr超能文献

RETTs-HEV 分诊系统的组内一致性。

Inter-rater agreement of the triage system RETTS-HEV.

机构信息

Departments of aEmergency bOccupational Medicine, Regional Hospital of Herning, Herning cResearch Center for Emergency Medicine, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;21(1):37-41. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32836397d9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inter-rater agreement among nurses using the triage system RETTS-HEV (rapid emergency triage and treatment system - hospital unit west) in a Danish emergency department (ED).

BACKGROUND

The use of triage systems in Denmark has been implemented recently together with structural changes in hospital organization. Testing and evaluation is therefore needed. The RETTS-HEV is a five-scale triage system being used in the ED of Herning, Denmark, since May 2010. The ED is semilarge, with 29 000 annual visits.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients presenting to the ED were assessed by both a duty and a study nurse using RETTS-HEV. Nurses did not receive training before the study. In all, 146 patients were enroled and a blinded, paired and simultaneous triage was conducted independently to evaluate inter-rater agreement using Fleiss κ.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients were triaged over a 10-day period and complete data were available for 146 patients. We found the overall agreement to be good [Fleiss κ 0.60 (95% confidence interval 0.48; 0.72)]. The κ estimate was higher for the group of patients who required immediate attention [0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.18; 1.47)].

CONCLUSION

The study found good inter-rater agreement between two independent observers not receiving any new triage training before the study.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估丹麦一家急诊科护士使用 RETTS-HEV(快速紧急分类和治疗系统-医院西区)分类系统的一致性。

背景

丹麦最近实施了分类系统的使用,并对医院组织进行了结构性改革。因此需要进行测试和评估。RETTs-HEV 是一种五分制分类系统,自 2010 年 5 月以来一直在丹麦赫宁的急诊科使用。该急诊科是一个半大型急诊科,每年有 29000 次就诊。

材料和方法

连续就诊的患者由值班护士和研究护士使用 RETTS-HEV 进行评估。护士在研究前未接受培训。共有 146 名患者入组,进行了盲法、配对和同步分类,使用 Fleiss κ 评估了观察者间的一致性。

结果

在 10 天的时间里,共有 155 名患者进行了分类,146 名患者有完整的数据。我们发现整体一致性较好[Fleiss κ 0.60(95%置信区间 0.48;0.72)]。需要立即关注的患者组的 κ 估计值更高[0.83(95%置信区间 0.18;1.47)]。

结论

本研究发现,在研究前未接受任何新分类培训的两名独立观察者之间,存在良好的观察者间一致性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验