• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种撞击式采样器测量空气中细菌和真菌浓度的比较评估。

Comparative evaluation of three impactor samplers for measuring airborne bacteria and fungi concentrations.

机构信息

Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm), Institut de Recherche Santé, Environnement & Travail (IRSET), Rennes, France.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Hyg. 2013;10(8):455-9. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.800955.

DOI:10.1080/15459624.2013.800955
PMID:23799861
Abstract

Portable microbial samplers are useful for detecting microorganisms in the air. However, limited data are available on their performance when sampling airborne biological agents in a routine practice. We compared bacterial and fungal concentrations obtained in field conditions using three impactor samplers with different designs (AES Chemunex Sampl'Air, bioMérieux Air Ideal, and Sartorius AirPort MD8/BACTair). The linearity of mold collection was tested in the range of 100 L to 1000 L, and all the devices had a correlation coefficient higher than 0.95. For optimal comparison of the samplers, we performed experiments in different hospital rooms with varying levels of air biocontamination. Each sampling procedure was repeated to assess reproducibility. No significant difference between the samplers was observed for the mold concentrations on Sabouraud agar, whereas Sampl'Air collected significantly more bacteria on tryptic soy agar than Air Ideal or BACTair at one of the sites. Impactor location in the room was nevertheless associated with the variability observed with the three samplers at the highest microbial concentration levels. On the basis of their performance, autonomy and simplicity of use, these three impactors are suitable for routine indoor evaluation of microbial air contamination.

摘要

便携式微生物采样器可用于检测空气中的微生物。然而,在常规实践中采样空气中生物制剂时,其性能的数据有限。我们比较了三种不同设计的撞击式采样器(AES Chemunex Sampl'Air、bioMérieux Air Ideal 和 Sartorius AirPort MD8/BACTair)在野外条件下获得的细菌和真菌浓度。在 100 升到 1000 升的范围内测试了霉菌收集的线性度,所有设备的相关系数均高于 0.95。为了对采样器进行最佳比较,我们在不同空气生物污染程度的医院房间中进行了实验。为了评估重现性,每个采样过程都重复进行。在萨布罗琼脂上,三种采样器对霉菌浓度没有显著差异,而在其中一个采样点,Sampl'Air 在胰蛋白酶大豆琼脂上收集的细菌比 Air Ideal 或 BACTair 多得多。然而,采样器在房间中的位置与在最高微生物浓度水平下三个采样器的可变性有关。基于其性能、自主性和使用简便性,这三种撞击式采样器适用于室内微生物空气污染的常规评估。

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of three impactor samplers for measuring airborne bacteria and fungi concentrations.三种撞击式采样器测量空气中细菌和真菌浓度的比较评估。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2013;10(8):455-9. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.800955.
2
Comparative performance of impactor air samplers for quantification of fungal contamination.撞击式空气采样器用于真菌污染定量的比较性能
J Hosp Infect. 2001 Feb;47(2):149-55. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2000.0883.
3
Bacterial and fungal counts in hospital air: comparative yields for 4 sieve impactor air samplers with 2 culture media.医院空气中的细菌和真菌计数:4种筛孔撞击式空气采样器与2种培养基的比较产量
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006 Dec;27(12):1405-8. doi: 10.1086/508840. Epub 2006 Nov 22.
4
Use of portable microbial samplers for estimating inhalation exposure to viable biological agents.使用便携式微生物采样器评估吸入活生物制剂的暴露情况。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;17(1):31-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500517. Epub 2006 Aug 16.
5
Total airborne mold particle sampling: evaluation of sample collection, preparation and counting procedures, and collection devices.空气中霉菌颗粒的总体采样:样本采集、制备、计数程序及采集装置的评估
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2008 Feb;5(2):100-6. doi: 10.1080/15459620701828310.
6
Variability of airborne microflora in a hospital ward within a period of one year.一年内医院病房空气中微生物群落的变异性。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2006;13(1):99-106.
7
A field comparison of four samplers for enumerating fungal aerosols I. Sampling characteristics.用于计数真菌气溶胶的四种采样器的现场比较 I. 采样特性
Indoor Air. 2004 Oct;14(5):360-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00259.x.
8
Air sampling of Aspergillus fumigatus and other thermotolerant fungi: comparative performance of the Sartorius MD8 airport and the Merck MAS-100 portable bioaerosol sampler.烟曲霉和其他耐热真菌的空气采样:赛多利斯MD8机场型和默克MAS - 100便携式生物气溶胶采样器的比较性能
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2007 Dec;210(6):733-739. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2006.10.001. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
9
Evaluation of portable air samplers for monitoring airborne culturable bacteria.用于监测空气中可培养细菌的便携式空气采样器的评估
AIHAJ. 2000 Nov-Dec;61(6):850-4. doi: 10.1080/15298660008984597.
10
Analysis of portable impactor performance for enumeration of viable bioaerosols.用于活菌生物气溶胶计数的便携式撞击器性能分析。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2007 Jul;4(7):514-24. doi: 10.1080/15459620701407388.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance Evaluation and Validation of Air Samplers To Detect Aerosolized Coxiella burnetii.空气中贝氏考克斯体气溶胶采样器的性能评估和验证
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Oct 26;10(5):e0065522. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00655-22. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
2
Monitoring of clinical strains and environmental fungal aerocontamination to prevent invasive aspergillosis infections in hospital during large deconstruction work: a protocol study.在大规模拆除工程期间监测临床菌株和环境真菌空气污染物以预防医院侵袭性曲霉病感染:一项方案研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 25;7(11):e018109. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018109.