Stroke Center at the Institute of Neurosciences, University Hospital, Favaloro Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Nov;22(8):e486-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 22.
It is unknown whether atrial fibrillation (AF) detected after acute ischemic stroke is caused by neurogenic or cardiogenic mechanisms. Based on the potential damage to the autonomic nervous system, neurogenic mechanisms could be implicated in the pathophysiology of newly diagnosed AF. To test this hypothesis, we developed a mechanistic approach by comparing a prespecified set of indicators in acute ischemic stroke patients with newly diagnosed AF, known AF, and sinus rhythm.
We prospectively assessed every acute ischemic stroke patient undergoing continuous electrocardiographic monitoring from 2008 through 2011. We compared newly diagnosed AF, known AF, and sinus rhythm patients by using 20 indicators grouped in 4 domains: vascular risk factors, underlying cardiac disease, burden of neurological injury, and in-hospital outcome.
We studied 275 acute ischemic stroke patients, 23 with newly diagnosed AF, 64 with known AF, and 188 with sinus rhythm. Patients with newly diagnosed AF had a lower proportion of left atrial enlargement (60.9% versus 91.2%, P=.001), a smaller left atrial area (22.0 versus 26.0 cm2, P=.021), and a higher frequency of insular involvement (30.4% versus 9.5%, P=.017) than participants with known AF. Compared with patients in sinus rhythm, those with newly diagnosed AF had a higher proportion of brain infarcts of 15 mm or more (60.9% versus 37.2%, P=.029) and a higher frequency of insular involvement (30.4% versus 7.3%, P<.001).
The low frequency of underlying cardiac disease and the strikingly high proportion of concurrent strategic insular infarctions in patients with newly diagnosed AF provide additional evidence supporting the role of neurogenic mechanisms in a subset of AF detected after acute ischemic stroke.
在急性缺血性脑卒中后检测到的心房颤动(AF)是由神经源性还是心源性机制引起的尚不清楚。基于对自主神经系统的潜在损害,神经源性机制可能与新诊断的 AF 的病理生理学有关。为了验证这一假说,我们通过比较一组预先指定的指标,开发了一种机制方法,这些指标包括急性缺血性脑卒中患者中新诊断的 AF、已知的 AF 和窦性节律。
我们前瞻性评估了 2008 年至 2011 年期间接受连续心电图监测的每一位急性缺血性脑卒中患者。我们通过使用 20 个指标,将新诊断的 AF、已知的 AF 和窦性节律患者分为 4 个组别进行比较:血管危险因素、潜在心脏病、神经损伤负担和住院结局。
我们研究了 275 名急性缺血性脑卒中患者,其中 23 名患有新诊断的 AF,64 名患有已知的 AF,188 名患有窦性节律。与患有已知 AF 的患者相比,新诊断的 AF 患者左心房扩大的比例较低(60.9%比 91.2%,P=0.001),左心房面积较小(22.0 比 26.0 cm2,P=0.021),岛叶受累的频率较高(30.4%比 9.5%,P=0.017)。与窦性节律患者相比,新诊断的 AF 患者脑梗死大于 15mm 的比例更高(60.9%比 37.2%,P=0.029),岛叶受累的频率更高(30.4%比 7.3%,P<0.001)。
新诊断的 AF 患者中潜在心脏病的发病率较低,同时伴有岛叶梗死的比例极高,这为急性缺血性脑卒中后检测到的 AF 中神经源性机制的作用提供了额外的证据支持。