S. Paulo Medical College of Acupuncture, Rua Tuim, 995, S. Paulo, SP, Brazil, 04514-103.
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013 Aug;17(8):354. doi: 10.1007/s11916-013-0354-7.
Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a complex chronic condition, the treatment of which still poses many challenges. Complementary therapies (CT) have gained increasing popularity among FMS patients. Past reviews evaluating effectiveness of CT for treatment of FMS revealed some potential benefits arising from certain modalities. However, with the data available, it becomes difficult to formulate a unique opinion about this matter. In the present paper, the authors propose some guidelines to conciliate the expectations of patients with the lack of solid evidence, in a practicable yet responsible way. Many items should be considered before prescribing, proscribing, or tolerating a CT, besides results from randomized controlled trials, such as efficacy (mechanisms of action); effectiveness (effect in practice); efficiency (cost-benefit ratio); safety; risk-benefit ratio; legislation; healthcare service involvement; practitioner characteristics; objective (purpose); and the potential of combination with conventional treatment.
纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)是一种复杂的慢性疾病,其治疗仍存在诸多挑战。补充疗法(CT)在 FMS 患者中越来越受欢迎。过去评估 CT 治疗 FMS 效果的综述显示,某些方法可能具有一定益处。然而,由于现有数据,对于这一问题很难形成独特的观点。在本文中,作者提出了一些指导方针,以务实且负责的方式调和患者的期望与缺乏确凿证据之间的矛盾。除了随机对照试验的结果外,在规定、禁止或容忍 CT 之前,还应考虑许多因素,如疗效(作用机制);有效性(实际效果);效率(成本效益比);安全性;风险效益比;法规;医疗保健服务的参与;从业者的特点;客观(目的);以及与传统治疗相结合的潜力。