National Center for Biotechnology Information, NLM, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MA, USA.
Bioessays. 2013 Sep;35(9):829-37. doi: 10.1002/bies.201300037. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
A common belief is that evolution generally proceeds towards greater complexity at both the organismal and the genomic level, numerous examples of reductive evolution of parasites and symbionts notwithstanding. However, recent evolutionary reconstructions challenge this notion. Two notable examples are the reconstruction of the complex archaeal ancestor and the intron-rich ancestor of eukaryotes. In both cases, evolution in most of the lineages was apparently dominated by extensive loss of genes and introns, respectively. These and many other cases of reductive evolution are consistent with a general model composed of two distinct evolutionary phases: the short, explosive, innovation phase that leads to an abrupt increase in genome complexity, followed by a much longer reductive phase, which encompasses either a neutral ratchet of genetic material loss or adaptive genome streamlining. Quantitatively, the evolution of genomes appears to be dominated by reduction and simplification, punctuated by episodes of complexification.
一种普遍的观点认为,在生物机体和基因组水平上,进化通常朝着更加复杂的方向发展,尽管寄生虫和共生体的简化进化有许多例子。然而,最近的进化重建挑战了这一观点。两个值得注意的例子是复杂古菌祖先和真核生物富含内含子的祖先的重建。在这两种情况下,大多数谱系的进化显然都受到了基因和内含子的大量丢失的支配。这些以及许多其他简化进化的例子与一个由两个不同的进化阶段组成的一般模型是一致的:短暂的、爆炸性的、创新的阶段,导致基因组复杂性的突然增加,随后是一个更长的简化阶段,包括遗传物质丢失的中性棘轮或适应性基因组简化。从数量上看,基因组的进化似乎主要是通过减少和简化来主导的,偶尔会出现复杂化的阶段。