British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, UK.
Environ Geochem Health. 2013 Oct;35(5):667-81. doi: 10.1007/s10653-013-9550-y. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
Nitrate pollution in groundwater, which is mainly from agricultural activities, remains an international problem. It threatens the environment, economics and human health. There is a rising trend in nitrate concentrations in many UK groundwater bodies. Research has shown it can take decades for leached nitrate from the soil to discharge into groundwater and surface water due to the 'store' of nitrate and its potentially long travel time in the unsaturated and saturated zones. However, this time lag is rarely considered in current water nitrate management and policy development. The aim of this study was to develop a catchment-scale integrated numerical method to investigate the nitrate lag time in the groundwater system, and the Eden Valley, UK, was selected as a case study area. The method involves three models, namely the nitrate time bomb-a process-based model to simulate the nitrate transport in the unsaturated zone (USZ), GISGroundwater--a GISGroundwater flow model, and N-FM--a model to simulate the nitrate transport in the saturated zone. This study answers the scientific questions of when the nitrate currently in the groundwater was loaded into the unsaturated zones and eventually reached the water table; is the rising groundwater nitrate concentration in the study area caused by historic nitrate load; what caused the uneven distribution of groundwater nitrate concentration in the study area; and whether the historic peak nitrate loading has reached the water table in the area. The groundwater nitrate in the area was mainly from the 1980s to 2000s, whilst the groundwater nitrate in most of the source protection zones leached into the system during 1940s-1970s; the large and spatially variable thickness of the USZ is one of the major reasons for unevenly distributed groundwater nitrate concentrations in the study area; the peak nitrate loading around 1983 has affected most of the study area. For areas around the Bowscar, Beacon Edge, Low Plains, Nord Vue, Dale Springs, Gamblesby, Bankwood Springs, and Cliburn, the peak nitrate loading will arrive at the water table in the next 34 years; statistical analysis shows that 8.7 % of the Penrith Sandstone and 7.3 % of the St Bees Sandstone have not been affected by peak nitrate. This research can improve the scientific understanding of nitrate processes in the groundwater system and support the effective management of groundwater nitrate pollution for the study area. With a limited number of parameters, the method and models developed in this study are readily transferable to other areas.
地下水硝酸盐污染主要来自农业活动,仍是一个国际问题。它威胁着环境、经济和人类健康。在许多英国地下水体中,硝酸盐浓度呈上升趋势。研究表明,由于硝酸盐的“储存”及其在非饱和带和饱和带中潜在的长传输时间,土壤中淋滤出的硝酸盐排入地下水和地表水需要数十年的时间。然而,在当前的水硝酸盐管理和政策制定中,很少考虑到这种时滞。本研究旨在开发一种流域尺度的综合数值方法来研究地下水系统中的硝酸盐滞后时间,英国埃登谷被选为案例研究区。该方法涉及三个模型,即硝酸盐定时炸弹-一种用于模拟非饱和带(USZ)中硝酸盐运移的基于过程的模型、GISGroundwater-一种地下水流动模型和 N-FM-一种用于模拟饱和带中硝酸盐运移的模型。本研究回答了当前地下水中的硝酸盐何时被加载到非饱和带并最终到达地下水位的科学问题;研究区地下水硝酸盐浓度升高是由历史硝酸盐负荷引起的吗;研究区地下水硝酸盐浓度分布不均匀的原因是什么;以及历史高峰硝酸盐负荷是否已到达该地区的地下水位。该地区的地下水硝酸盐主要来自 20 世纪 80 年代至 21 世纪,而大部分水源保护区的地下水硝酸盐在 20 世纪 40 年代至 70 年代期间就已进入系统;USZ 的大且空间变化的厚度是非饱和带中地下水硝酸盐浓度分布不均匀的主要原因之一;1983 年左右的硝酸盐峰值负荷影响了研究区的大部分地区。对于 Bowscar、Beacon Edge、Low Plains、Nord Vue、Dale Springs、Gamblesby、Bankwood Springs 和 Cliburn 周围地区,峰值硝酸盐负荷将在未来 34 年内到达地下水位;统计分析表明,8.7%的彭里斯砂岩和 7.3%的圣比斯砂岩尚未受到峰值硝酸盐的影响。这项研究可以提高对地下水系统中硝酸盐过程的科学认识,并支持对研究区地下水硝酸盐污染的有效管理。该方法和模型开发所使用的参数数量有限,易于推广到其他地区。