Suppr超能文献

以问题解决为导向的结构化医患沟通(DIALOG+)在社区精神分裂症患者治疗中的效果--一项集群随机对照试验。

Effectiveness of structured patient-clinician communication with a solution focused approach (DIALOG+) in community treatment of patients with psychosis--a cluster randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London, Newham Centre for Mental Health, London E13 8SP, UK.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Jun 26;13:173. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-173.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Large numbers of patients with psychosis have regular meetings with key clinicians in the community. There is little evidence on how these meetings should be conducted to be therapeutically effective. DIALOG, a computer mediated procedure, was shown to improve outcomes in a European multi-centre trial. DIALOG structures the patient-clinician communication and makes it patient-centred, but does not guide clinicians as to how to respond to patients' concerns. DIALOG has been further developed into DIALOG+, which uses advanced software and, additionally, provides a four step approach--based on a solution focused model--for addressing patients' concerns. We designed a cluster randomised controlled trial to test the effectiveness of DIALOG+ in improving treatment outcomes of patients with psychosis in the community.

METHODS/DESIGN: Key workers are recruited from community mental health teams in East London and randomly allocated to either the intervention or control group. Out of their case loads, we identify patients with schizophrenia (F 20-29) and a moderate or lower level of subjective quality of life (MANSA score <5), who are treated according to the allocation of their key workers. Key workers in the intervention group are trained in using DIALOG+ and use it with each patient over a six-month period. Control patients rate their satisfaction with life and treatment on a tablet to control for the effect of regular ratings and the use of modern technology. We are recruiting up to 42 key workers to reach a total sample size of 180 patients. Clinical and social outcomes including costs are assessed after 3, 6 and 12 months. Primary outcome is subjective quality-of-life at 6 months.

DISCUSSION

The trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel intervention (DIALOG+) which uses modern technology to support routine patient-clinician meetings in community care, makes the communication patient centred and guides patients and clinicians to address concerns. DIALOG+ is a generic and widely applicable intervention. If shown as effective, it can be used to improve outcomes of community care on a large scale, ensuring that routine encounters are therapeutically effective. DIALOG+ can also be implemented across services at relatively low additional costs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN34757603.

摘要

背景

大量精神病患者会定期与社区的主要临床医生会面。关于这些会议应该如何进行才能达到治疗效果,目前几乎没有证据。在一项欧洲多中心试验中,一种名为 DIALOG 的计算机介导程序已被证明可以改善结果。DIALOG 构建了医患沟通,使其以患者为中心,但并未指导临床医生如何回应患者的担忧。DIALOG 已进一步开发为 DIALOG+,它使用先进的软件,并另外提供了一种基于解决方案聚焦模型的四步方法,用于解决患者的问题。我们设计了一项集群随机对照试验,以测试 DIALOG+在改善社区精神病患者治疗结果方面的有效性。

方法/设计:从东伦敦社区心理健康团队中招募关键工作人员,并将其随机分配到干预组或对照组。在他们的病例中,我们确定了患有精神分裂症(F20-29)且主观生活质量中等或较低(MANSA 评分<5)的患者,他们根据关键工作人员的分配接受治疗。干预组的关键工作人员接受使用 DIALOG+的培训,并在六个月内与每位患者一起使用它。对照组的患者在平板电脑上对生活和治疗的满意度进行评分,以控制常规评分和使用现代技术的影响。我们正在招募多达 42 名关键工作人员,以达到 180 名患者的总样本量。在 3、6 和 12 个月后评估临床和社会结果,包括成本。主要结果是 6 个月时的主观生活质量。

讨论

该试验旨在评估一种新的干预措施(DIALOG+)的有效性,该措施使用现代技术支持社区护理中的常规医患会议,使沟通以患者为中心,并指导患者和临床医生解决问题。DIALOG+是一种通用且广泛适用的干预措施。如果证明有效,它可以用于大规模改善社区护理的结果,确保常规接触具有治疗效果。DIALOG+也可以以相对较低的额外成本在各个服务部门实施。

试验注册

当前对照试验 ISRCTN34757603。

相似文献

2
10
Non-uniform effectiveness of structured patient-clinician communication in community mental healthcare: an international comparison.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011 Aug;46(8):685-93. doi: 10.1007/s00127-010-0235-x. Epub 2010 May 19.

引用本文的文献

10
Trends, challenges, and priorities for shared decision making in mental health: The first umbrella review.
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;69(4):823-840. doi: 10.1177/00207640221140291. Epub 2023 Jan 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Non-uniform effectiveness of structured patient-clinician communication in community mental healthcare: an international comparison.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011 Aug;46(8):685-93. doi: 10.1007/s00127-010-0235-x. Epub 2010 May 19.
3
Objective social outcomes index (SIX): a method to summarise objective indicators of social outcomes in mental health care.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2008 Jul;118(1):57-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01217.x.
4
The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Nov 27;5:63. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-63.
6
A new scale to assess the therapeutic relationship in community mental health care: STAR.
Psychol Med. 2007 Jan;37(1):85-95. doi: 10.1017/S0033291706009299. Epub 2006 Nov 9.
7
Use of standardised outcome measures in adult mental health services: randomised controlled trial.
Br J Psychiatry. 2006 Oct;189:330-6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.015412.
8
The therapeutic relationship in psychiatric settings.
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 2006(429):69-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00721.x.
9
Incidence of bipolar affective disorder in three UK cities: results from the AESOP study.
Br J Psychiatry. 2005 Feb;186:126-31. doi: 10.1192/bjp.186.2.126.
10
The therapeutic relationship in the treatment of severe mental illness: a review of methods and findings.
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;50(2):115-28. doi: 10.1177/0020764004040959.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验