Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(5):304-13. doi: 10.1159/000430991. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
DIALOG+ was developed as a computer-mediated intervention, consisting of a structured assessment of patients' concerns combined with a solution-focused approach to initiate change. This study tested the effectiveness of DIALOG+ in the community treatment of patients with psychosis.
This was a pragmatic, exploratory, parallel-group, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Clinicians within community teams - along with patients with psychosis under their care - were randomised to use DIALOG+ once per month for 6 months or an active control. The primary outcome (subjective quality of life, SQOL) and secondary outcomes were assessed after 3, 6 and 12 months by blinded assessors and analysed using mixed-effect models.
A total of 49 clinicians and 179 patients were randomised. Implementation of DIALOG+ was variable, with an average of 1.8 sessions (SD = 1.6) in the first 3 months and 1.1 (SD = 1.2) in the following 3 months. Patients in the DIALOG+ arm had better SQOL at 3, 6 and 12 months (p = 0.035, 0.058 and 0.014, respectively; Cohen's d = 0.29-0.34). They also had significantly fewer unmet needs at 3 and 6 months, fewer general psychopathological symptoms at all time points and better objective social outcomes at 12 months, with no significant differences in other outcomes. Overall care costs were lower in the intervention group.
Despite variable implementation, DIALOG+ is a beneficial intervention for community patients with psychosis. As a non-expensive and potentially cost-saving, generic intervention, DIALOG+ may be widely used and may improve the effectiveness of community treatment. Further trials should test DIALOG+ in different patient groups and contexts.
DIALOG+ 是一种计算机介导的干预措施,由对患者关注的结构化评估和以解决问题为导向的方法相结合,以启动变化。本研究检验了 DIALOG+ 在社区精神疾病患者治疗中的有效性。
这是一项实用、探索性、平行组、聚类随机对照试验。社区团队中的临床医生——以及他们所照顾的精神疾病患者——被随机分配每月使用 DIALOG+一次,为期 6 个月,或使用活性对照。主要结局(主观生活质量,SQOL)和次要结局由盲法评估者在 3、6 和 12 个月后评估,并使用混合效应模型进行分析。
共有 49 名临床医生和 179 名患者被随机分配。DIALOG+的实施情况存在差异,在前 3 个月平均进行了 1.8 次(SD = 1.6),在后 3 个月平均进行了 1.1 次(SD = 1.2)。DIALOG+组的患者在 3、6 和 12 个月时的 SQOL 更好(p = 0.035、0.058 和 0.014,分别;Cohen's d = 0.29-0.34)。他们在 3 个月和 6 个月时未满足的需求也显著减少,所有时间点的一般精神病理症状也显著减少,12 个月时客观社会结局更好,其他结局没有显著差异。干预组的整体护理费用较低。
尽管实施情况存在差异,DIALOG+对社区精神疾病患者是一种有益的干预措施。作为一种非昂贵且具有潜在成本效益的通用干预措施,DIALOG+可能会得到广泛应用,并可能提高社区治疗的效果。进一步的试验应在不同的患者群体和环境中测试 DIALOG+。