Malik Ashar Muhammad, Peppl Renata, Sajun Sana Zehra Zehra, Qureshi Onaiza, Priya Krishna, Sarwar Hufsa, Ramachandran Padmavati, Venkatraman Lakshmi, Evans-Lacko Sara, Bird Victoria Jane
Community Health Sciences, The Aga Khan University Faculty of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
Faculty of Arts and Sciences, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 8;15(1):e080737. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080737.
Approximately 69%-89% of people with severe mental illnesses, particularly psychosis, experience a treatment gap in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to factors such as low public spending on health and weak healthcare systems. The PIECEs project aims to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a solution-focused resource-oriented approach (DIALOG+) for improving the quality of life and mental well-being of people with psychosis in India and Pakistan.
The research design of this analysis is an economic evaluation piggybacked on the PIECEs randomised control trial to test the feasibility of DIALOG+ in India and Pakistan. It implies a cost-utility analysis with a health system perspective. The costs include the cost of the intervention, the cost of healthcare providers and the cost to the household. The primary outcome will be quality-adjusted life years. Incremental cost, incremental effectiveness and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios will be calculated using linear regression models with a hierarchical data structure. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis will be carried out to test for the uncertainty surrounding the estimates of cost-effectiveness.
This study will provide evidence of a patient-centred approach to improve the quality of community-based care for people with psychosis in India and Pakistan. The economic evaluation will support efforts to scale up low-cost healthcare interventions such as DIALOG+ to rural and unserved areas, which is otherwise challenging in the resource-constrained health systems in many LMICs.
The evidence on the cost-effectiveness of DIALOG+ will contribute to efforts to improve community-based care and the quality of life for millions of people suffering from mental health problems in India and Pakistan who experience psychosis.
This study is approved by the Queen Mary Ethics of Research Committee (UK), Institutional Ethics Committee of SCARF (India), IRD's Independent Institutional Review Board (IRD_IRB_2021_01_005) (Pakistan), Karawan-e-Hayat Management Committee (Institutional Approval) (Pakistan), Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre Research Committee (NO.F.2-81/2021-GENL/60224/JPMC) (Pakistan), Aga Khan's Ethics Research Committee (2021-5933-17533) (Pakistan) and National Bio-Ethics Committee, Pakistan (Ref: No.4-87/NBC-774/22/2037 Date: 17 May 2022).The findings of this research will be widely disseminated through research publications and engagement with the communities and the healthcare providers in the public and not-for-profit sectors.
ISRCTN13022816.
在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),约69%-89%的重症精神疾病患者,尤其是精神病患者,由于卫生公共支出低和医疗保健系统薄弱等因素,存在治疗缺口。PIECES项目旨在评估一种以解决方案为重点、以资源为导向的方法(DIALOG+)对改善印度和巴基斯坦精神病患者生活质量和心理健康的有效性及成本效益。
本分析的研究设计是一项基于PIECES随机对照试验的经济评估,以测试DIALOG+在印度和巴基斯坦的可行性。这意味着从卫生系统角度进行成本效用分析。成本包括干预成本、医疗保健提供者成本和家庭成本。主要结果将是质量调整生命年。将使用具有分层数据结构的线性回归模型计算增量成本、增量有效性和增量成本效益比。将进行概率敏感性分析,以测试成本效益估计的不确定性。
本研究将为以患者为中心的方法提供证据,以改善印度和巴基斯坦针对精神病患者的社区护理质量。经济评估将支持在农村和未得到服务的地区扩大DIALOG+等低成本医疗干预措施的努力,否则在许多低收入和中等收入国家资源有限的卫生系统中这具有挑战性。
关于DIALOG+成本效益的证据将有助于改善印度和巴基斯坦数百万患有精神病的心理健康问题患者的社区护理和生活质量。
本研究已获得玛丽女王研究伦理委员会(英国)、SCARF机构伦理委员会(印度)、IRD独立机构审查委员会(IRD_IRB_2021_01_005)(巴基斯坦)、卡拉万-伊-哈亚特管理委员会(机构批准)(巴基斯坦)、真纳研究生医学中心研究委员会(编号:F.2-81/2021-GENL/60224/JPMC)(巴基斯坦)、阿迦汗伦理研究委员会(2021-5933-17533)(巴基斯坦)和巴基斯坦国家生物伦理委员会(参考编号:4-87/NBC-774/22/2037 日期:2022年5月17日)的批准。本研究结果将通过研究出版物以及与公共部门和非营利部门的社区及医疗保健提供者的交流广泛传播。
ISRCTN13022816