Steuer W, Grant I, Erni F
Pharma Division, Sandoz Ltd., Basle, Switzerland.
J Chromatogr. 1990 May 16;507:125-40. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(01)84188-1.
High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) and capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) are compared with respect to their usefulness in drug analysis. Factors discussed include efficiency, performance, sensitivity, optimization parameters, method development time, sample preparation, technical difficulties, orthogonality of the information obtained and the possible application to various substance groups. It is concluded that HPLC can be applied successfully in virtually all areas of pharmaceutical analysis. CZE has a promising future in the analysis of drugs and in the field of biotechnological analysis, where a high number of plates is required together with a short analysis time. Nevertheless improvements in detection are still necessary for most applications. SFC is particularly suitable for moderately polar compounds or substances for which mass-sensitive detection is required. SFC and CZE can be considered as complementary to HPLC owing to the orthogonality of the acquired data, and as a result more information can be obtained from the analysis.
对高效液相色谱法(HPLC)、超临界流体色谱法(SFC)和毛细管区带电泳法(CZE)在药物分析中的实用性进行了比较。讨论的因素包括效率、性能、灵敏度、优化参数、方法开发时间、样品制备、技术难点、所获信息的正交性以及对各种物质组的可能应用。得出的结论是,HPLC几乎可以成功应用于药物分析的所有领域。CZE在药物分析以及生物技术分析领域有着广阔的前景,在这些领域需要大量的塔板数以及较短的分析时间。然而,对于大多数应用而言,检测方面仍需改进。SFC特别适用于中等极性化合物或需要质量敏感检测的物质。由于所采集数据的正交性,SFC和CZE可被视为HPLC的补充,因此通过分析可以获得更多信息。