• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

再取走我的一小片心脏:规范人类生物样本的研究使用。

Take another little piece of my heart: regulating the research use of human biospecimens.

机构信息

Sidley Austin.

出版信息

J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Summer;41(2):424-39. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12053.

DOI:10.1111/jlme.12053
PMID:23802895
Abstract

This article reviews the history of the debate over use of biospecimens in research, the legal and ethical arguments that have been presented both in support of and in opposition to such use, court cases and judicial opinions involving disputes between specimen contributors, researchers, and institutions, and public attitudes regarding the use of biospecimens in research. The paper argues that proposed changes to the Common Rule are inadequate to resolve the legal and ethical concerns that have been raised with respect to the use of biospecimens. It argues that there is a need to distinguish between the dual roles - subject and donor - played by contributors of biospecimens.

摘要

本文回顾了关于在研究中使用生物样本的争论历史,以及支持和反对这种使用的法律和伦理论点,包括涉及样本提供者、研究人员和机构之间争议的案例和司法意见,以及公众对研究中使用生物样本的态度。本文认为,对《普遍规则》的拟议修改不足以解决围绕生物样本使用提出的法律和伦理问题。本文认为,有必要区分生物样本提供者所扮演的双重角色——主体和供体。

相似文献

1
Take another little piece of my heart: regulating the research use of human biospecimens.再取走我的一小片心脏:规范人类生物样本的研究使用。
J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Summer;41(2):424-39. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12053.
2
Ethical and legal issues in research involving human subjects: do you want a piece of me?涉及人类受试者的研究中的伦理和法律问题:你想了解一下吗?
J Clin Pathol. 2006 Apr;59(4):335-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2005.030957.
3
Encouraging translational research through harmonization of FDA and common rule informed consent requirements for research with banked specimens.通过协调美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和通用规则中关于使用储存样本进行研究的知情同意要求,鼓励转化研究。
J Leg Med. 2006 Jun;27(2):119-66. doi: 10.1080/01947640600716366.
4
Implementing Regulatory Broad Consent Under the Revised Common Rule: Clarifying Key Points and the Need for Evidence.实施经修订的通用规则下的监管广泛同意:澄清要点和证据需求。
J Law Med Ethics. 2019 Jun;47(2):213-231. doi: 10.1177/1073110519857277.
5
CTSA Institution Responses to Proposed Common Rule Changes: Did They Get What They Wanted?临床与转化科学奖机构对拟议的《通用规则》变更的回应:他们如愿以偿了吗?
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 Apr;12(2):79-86. doi: 10.1177/1556264617698606. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
6
When informed consent is not required in studies.在研究中无需获得知情同意时。
Hum Res Rep. 2006 Jun;21(6):3.
7
Ethics and law in research with human biological samples: a new approach.人类生物样本研究中的伦理与法律:一种新方法。
Drug Metabol Drug Interact. 2014;29(1):61-3. doi: 10.1515/dmdi-2013-0055.
8
Human tissue ownership and use in research: what laboratorians and researchers should know.人类组织在研究中的所有权和使用:实验室人员和研究人员应了解的内容。
Clin Chem. 2010 Nov;56(11):1675-82. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.150672. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
9
Promoting medical research without sacrificing patient autonomy: legal and ethical issues raised by the waiver of informed consent for emergency research.在不牺牲患者自主性的前提下促进医学研究:紧急研究中知情同意书豁免引发的法律和伦理问题。
Oklahoma Law Rev. 1999 Winter;52(4):565-91.
10
A trade secret model for genomic biobanking.基因组生物库的商业秘密模型。
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Fall;40(3):612-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00694.x.

引用本文的文献

1
An empirical assessment of the short-term impacts of a reading of Deborah Zoe Laufer's drama Informed Consent on attitudes and intentions to participate in genetic research.对阅读黛博拉·佐伊·劳弗的戏剧《知情同意》对参与基因研究的态度和意愿的短期影响进行实证评估。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018 Apr-Jun;9(2):69-76. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1449771. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
2
The biobank for the molecular classification of kidney disease: research translation and precision medicine in nephrology.肾脏疾病分子分类生物样本库:肾脏病学中的研究转化与精准医学
BMC Nephrol. 2017 Jul 26;18(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0669-4.
3
Engaging a state: Facebook comments on a large population biobank.
参与一种状态:脸书对一个大型人群生物样本库的评论
J Community Genet. 2017 Jul;8(3):183-197. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0302-z. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
4
Still Human: A Call for Increased Focus on Ethical Standards in Cadaver Research.依然是人类:呼吁在尸体研究中更加关注道德标准
HEC Forum. 2016 Dec;28(4):355-367. doi: 10.1007/s10730-016-9309-9.
5
Lessons from HeLa Cells: The Ethics and Policy of Biospecimens.源自海拉细胞的教训:生物样本的伦理与政策
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2016 Aug 31;17:395-417. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083115-022536. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
6
Investigator Experiences and Attitudes About Research With Biospecimens.研究者对生物样本研究的经验与态度。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Dec;10(5):449-56. doi: 10.1177/1556264615610199.
7
Public Comments on Proposed Regulatory Reforms That Would Impact Biospecimen Research: The Good, the Bad, and the Puzzling.关于可能影响生物样本研究的拟议监管改革的公众意见:优点、缺点与困惑之处。
IRB. 2015 Sep-Oct;37(5):1-10.