• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究者对生物样本研究的经验与态度。

Investigator Experiences and Attitudes About Research With Biospecimens.

作者信息

Rivera Suzanne M, Goldenberg Aaron, Rosenthal Beth, Aungst Heide, Maschke Karen J, Rothwell Erin, Anderson Rebecca A, Botkin Jeffrey, Joffe Steven

机构信息

Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Dec;10(5):449-56. doi: 10.1177/1556264615610199.

DOI:10.1177/1556264615610199
PMID:26564943
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4646730/
Abstract

To advance scientific knowledge about human diseases and effective therapeutic treatments, investigators need access to human biospecimens and associated data. However, regulatory and procedural requirements may impede investigators' efforts to share biospecimens and data within and across institutions. Although a number of studies have explored experiences and attitudes of study participants and others about biospecimen and data sharing, less is known about investigators' perspectives. We conducted an electronic survey to learn about investigators' experiences and attitudes about research with biospecimens and associated data. A total of 114 practicing scientists from a pool of 60 university medical schools with Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs) funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) participated. We found a high degree of variability in investigators' experiences with institutional review boards (IRBs) when seeking approval to conduct biospecimen research, as well as differences in approaches to informed consent for the collection of specimens. Participants also expressed concerns that the risks of biospecimen research may be overestimated by IRBs. This research suggests that the current regulatory environment for human research protections may require reconsideration with regard to standards for collection, use, and sharing of biospecimens and data.

摘要

为了推动有关人类疾病和有效治疗方法的科学知识发展,研究人员需要获取人类生物样本及相关数据。然而,监管和程序要求可能会阻碍研究人员在机构内部和跨机构共享生物样本和数据的努力。尽管已有多项研究探讨了研究参与者及其他人员对生物样本和数据共享的经历与态度,但对于研究人员的观点却知之甚少。我们开展了一项电子调查,以了解研究人员对使用生物样本及相关数据进行研究的经历和态度。共有来自60所获得美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)临床和转化科学奖(CTSA)资助的大学医学院的114名在职科学家参与了此次调查。我们发现,研究人员在寻求开展生物样本研究的批准时,与机构审查委员会(IRB)打交道的经历存在很大差异,在样本采集知情同意的方式上也有所不同。参与者还表达了对IRB可能高估生物样本研究风险的担忧。这项研究表明,当前人类研究保护的监管环境可能需要在生物样本和数据的采集、使用及共享标准方面重新加以考量。

相似文献

1
Investigator Experiences and Attitudes About Research With Biospecimens.研究者对生物样本研究的经验与态度。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Dec;10(5):449-56. doi: 10.1177/1556264615610199.
2
IRB practices and policies regarding the secondary research use of biospecimens.机构审查委员会(IRB)关于生物样本二次研究使用的实践和政策。
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 May 8;16:32. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0020-1.
3
To Share or Not to Share? A Survey of Biomedical Researchers in the U.S. Southwest, an Ethnically Diverse Region.分享还是不分享?对美国西南部一个种族多样化地区的生物医学研究人员的调查。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 17;10(9):e0138239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138239. eCollection 2015.
4
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
5
Patient Preferences for Use of Archived Biospecimens from Oncology Trials When Adequacy of Informed Consent Is Unclear.当肿瘤试验的知情同意是否充分不明确时,患者对使用存档生物样本的偏好。
Oncologist. 2020 Jan;25(1):78-86. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0365. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
6
"I don't want to be Henrietta Lacks": diverse patient perspectives on donating biospecimens for precision medicine research.“我不想成为海瑞塔·拉克斯”:不同患者对捐赠生物样本进行精准医学研究的看法。
Genet Med. 2019 Jan;21(1):107-113. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0032-6. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
7
The Practice of Research Ethics in Lebanon and Qatar: Perspectives of Researchers on Informed Consent.黎巴嫩和卡塔尔的研究伦理实践:研究人员对知情同意的看法
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 Dec;12(5):352-362. doi: 10.1177/1556264617730643. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
8
Researchers' Perspectives Regarding Ethical Issues of Biobank Research in the Arab Region.研究人员对阿拉伯地区生物库研究中伦理问题的看法。
Biopreserv Biobank. 2024 Apr;22(2):98-109. doi: 10.1089/bio.2022.0112. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
9
Patient Perspectives About Decisions to Share Medical Data and Biospecimens for Research.患者对分享医疗数据和生物样本用于研究的决策的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e199550. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9550.
10
Harmonizing Global Biospecimen Consent Practices to Advance Translational Research: A Call to Action.协调全球生物样本采集同意实践以推进转化研究:行动呼吁。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Mar;101(3):317-319. doi: 10.1002/cpt.461. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Researchers' Perspectives Regarding Ethical Issues of Biobank Research in the Arab Region.研究人员对阿拉伯地区生物库研究中伦理问题的看法。
Biopreserv Biobank. 2024 Apr;22(2):98-109. doi: 10.1089/bio.2022.0112. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
2
Research approvals iceberg: how a 'low-key' study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better.研究审批的冰山:在英格兰,一项“低调”的研究为何需要 89 名专业人员来批准,以及我们如何才能做得更好。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jan 25;20(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0339-5.
3
Ethical issues related to clinical research and rare diseases: 15th Gordon L. Snider Critical Issues Workshop, April 1, 2016, Bethesda, Maryland.与临床研究和罕见病相关的伦理问题:第15届戈登·L·斯奈德关键问题研讨会,2016年4月1日,马里兰州贝塞斯达
Transl Sci Rare Dis. 2017 Dec 18;2(3-4):175-194. doi: 10.3233/TRD-170013.
4
"It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa.“一切都关乎信任”:研究人员对南非生物样本库相关复杂性与争议的反思
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Oct 10;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0140-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Biobanking Research and Human Subjects Protections: Perspectives of IRB Leaders.生物样本库研究与人体受试者保护:机构审查委员会负责人的观点
IRB. 2015 Mar-Apr;37(2):8-13.
2
Scientists' perspectives on consent in the context of biobanking research.科学家对生物样本库研究背景下知情同意的看法。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 May;23(5):569-74. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.143. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
3
Take another little piece of my heart: regulating the research use of human biospecimens.再取走我的一小片心脏:规范人类生物样本的研究使用。
J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Summer;41(2):424-39. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12053.
4
The evolution of biobanking best practices.生物样本库最佳实践的发展。
Clin Chim Acta. 2012 Oct 9;413(19-20):1569-75. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.04.030. Epub 2012 May 3.
5
Clarity and appeal of a multimedia informed consent tool for biobanking.生物样本库多媒体知情同意工具的清晰度和吸引力。
IRB. 2012 Jan-Feb;34(1):9-19.
6
Advancing translational research collaborations.推进转化研究合作。
Sci Transl Med. 2010 Dec 22;2(63):63cm30. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001636.
7
Informed consent in genomics and genetic research.基因组学和遗传研究中的知情同意。
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2010;11:361-81. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141711.
8
Genetic research with stored biological materials: ethics and practice.利用储存生物材料进行的基因研究:伦理与实践
IRB. 2010 Mar-Apr;32(2):7-18.
9
Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.研究电子数据采集(REDCap)——一种用于提供转化研究信息学支持的元数据驱动方法和工作流程。
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
10
The Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Consortium and the translational research model.临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)联盟及转化研究模式。
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Mar;8(3):58-60; discussion W1-3. doi: 10.1080/15265160802109389.