Department of Neurology-Behavioral Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Neurology. 2013 Jul 23;81(4):337-45. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31829c5ed5. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
We assessed whether clinical and imaging features of subjects with apraxia of speech (AOS) more severe than aphasia (dominant AOS) are more similar to agrammatic primary progressive aphasia (agPPA) or to primary progressive AOS (PPAOS).
Sixty-seven subjects (PPAOS = 18, dominant AOS = 10, agPPA = 9, age-matched controls = 30) who all had volumetric MRI, diffusion tensor imaging, F18-fluorodeoxyglucose and C11-labeled Pittsburgh compound B (PiB)-PET scanning, as well as neurologic and speech and language assessments, were included in this case-control study. AOS was classified as either type 1, predominated by sound distortions and distorted sound substitutions, or type 2, predominated by syllabically segmented prosodic speech patterns.
The dominant AOS subjects most often had AOS type 2, similar to PPAOS. In contrast, agPPA subjects most often had type 1 (p = 0.01). Both dominant AOS and PPAOS showed focal imaging abnormalities in premotor cortex, whereas agPPA showed widespread involvement affecting premotor, prefrontal, temporal and parietal lobes, caudate, and insula. Only the dominant AOS and PPAOS groups showed midbrain atrophy compared with controls. No differences were observed in PiB binding across all 3 groups, with the majority being PiB negative.
These results suggest that dominant AOS is more similar to PPAOS than agPPA, with dominant AOS and PPAOS exhibiting a clinically distinguishable subtype of progressive AOS compared with agPPA.
我们评估了言语失用症(AOS)严重程度超过失语症(优势 AOS)的患者的临床和影像学特征是否更类似于语法性进行性失语症(agPPA)或进行性 AOS(PPAOS)。
这项病例对照研究纳入了 67 名受试者(PPAOS=18 名,优势 AOS=10 名,agPPA=9 名,年龄匹配的对照组=30 名),他们均接受了容积 MRI、弥散张量成像、F18-氟代脱氧葡萄糖和 C11 标记的匹兹堡化合物 B(PiB)-正电子发射断层扫描,以及神经学和言语语言评估。AOS 分为 1 型,以声音扭曲和扭曲声音替代为主,或 2 型,以音节分段韵律言语模式为主。
优势 AOS 患者最常出现 AOS 类型 2,与 PPAOS 相似。相比之下,agPPA 患者最常出现类型 1(p=0.01)。优势 AOS 和 PPAOS 均显示运动前皮质的局灶性影像学异常,而 agPPA 则显示广泛受累,影响运动前皮质、前额叶皮质、颞叶和顶叶、尾状核和脑岛。只有优势 AOS 和 PPAOS 组与对照组相比出现中脑萎缩。在所有 3 组中,PiB 结合均无差异,大多数为 PiB 阴性。
这些结果表明,优势 AOS 与 PPAOS 更相似,而不是与 agPPA 相似,优势 AOS 和 PPAOS 与 agPPA 相比,表现出一种可临床区分的进行性 AOS 亚类。