Seven-year clinical outcomes of unprotected left main coronary artery stenting with drug-eluting stent and bare-metal stent.

BACKGROUND

The superiority of drug-eluting stents (DES) over bare-metal stents (BMS) 7 years after unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenting has not been investigated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From 2003 to 2005, 182 patients underwent stent implantation for unprotected LMCA disease (DES, 96 patients; BMS, 86 patients; acute coronary syndrome cases excluded), and the 7-year clinical outcomes between the DES and BMS groups were compared. The incidence of cardiac death or non-fatal myocardial infarction was similar between the DES and BMS groups (11.0% vs. 13.5%, P=0.78). The incidence of target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 7 years was significantly lower in the DES group than in the BMS group (26.4% vs. 40.5%, P=0.009); the incidence from 1 to 4 years and that beyond 4 years were similar between the DES and BMS groups (8.9% vs. 7.9%, P=0.97; 10.0% vs. 8.7%, P=0.74, respectively). Among patients with bifurcation lesions, whereas the incidence of 7-year TLR was significantly lower in the DES group than the BMS group in patients undergoing single-stent procedures (15.9% vs. 48.6%, P=0.002), it was similar between the 2 groups in patients undergoing 2-stent procedures (38.5% vs. 39.3%, P=0.49).

CONCLUSIONS

With the exception of the 2-stent procedure, the 7-year outcomes after DES implantation for LMCA disease were superior to those after BMS implantation because of the lower TLR rate, when considering TLR during the late phase.