Centre for Translational Neuroscience and Mental Health, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, , Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Br J Sports Med. 2014 Jan;48(2):84-90. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092646. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
To provide a critical review of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) by considering the range of clinical presentations, neuropathology and the strength of evidence for CTE as a distinct syndrome.
Seven electronic databases were searched using a combination of MeSH terms and key words to identify relevant articles.
Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to select studies for review. Data extracted where present included study population, exposure/outcome measures, clinical data, neurological examination findings, cognitive assessment, investigation results and neuropathology results.
The data from 158 published case studies were reviewed. Critical differences between the older descriptions of CTE (the 'classic' syndrome) and the recent descriptions (the 'modern' syndrome) exist in the age of onset, natural history, clinical features, pathological findings and diagnostic criteria, which suggests that modern CTE is a different syndrome. The methodology of the current studies does not allow determination of aetiology or risk factors.
The clinicopathological differences between the 'classic' CTE syndrome and the 'modern' syndrome suggest that the new syndrome needs a different nomenclature. Further research is required to clearly define the clinical phenotype of the modern CTE syndrome and establish the underlying aetiology. Future research needs to address these issues through large-scale, prospective clinicopathological studies.
通过考虑慢性创伤性脑病(CTE)的临床表现范围、神经病理学以及 CTE 作为一种独特综合征的证据强度,对其进行批判性评估。
使用 MeSH 术语和关键词的组合,在七个电子数据库中进行搜索,以确定相关文章。
使用特定的纳入和排除标准选择进行综述的研究。如果存在数据,则提取的数据包括研究人群、暴露/结局测量、临床数据、神经系统检查结果、认知评估、调查结果和神经病理学结果。
对 158 篇已发表病例研究的数据进行了回顾。CTE 的旧描述(“经典”综合征)和新描述(“现代”综合征)之间存在关键差异,表现在发病年龄、自然病史、临床特征、病理发现和诊断标准方面,这表明现代 CTE 是一种不同的综合征。目前研究的方法学无法确定病因或危险因素。
“经典”CTE 综合征与“现代”综合征之间的临床病理差异表明,新综合征需要不同的命名法。需要进一步研究以明确界定现代 CTE 综合征的临床表型,并确定其潜在病因。未来的研究需要通过大规模、前瞻性的临床病理研究来解决这些问题。