Department of Anthropology, Wellesley College.
Med Anthropol Q. 2013 Jun;27(2):175-92. doi: 10.1111/maq.12022. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
This article examines the trope of reproduction in narratives of Tibetan refugees living in Dharamsala, India. As they make sense of their personal histories, Tibetan refugees invoke a collective story that mirrors human rights literature on Tibet. Women come into contact with this literature through its incorporation into a political discourse expressed by the exile government and health institutions. The article traces facets of this discourse that deal centrally with reproduction. Political discourse on reproduction articulates pronatalism as a solution to the refugee community's concern with survival, and the discourse frames modernity as a site of violence through China's reproductive regulations. And yet, Tibetan refugees also employ the notion of modernity when discussing their own free reproductive decision-making, positioning modern reproductive interventions in opposition to Indian society. The article demonstrates that Tibetan refugees navigate competing figurations of modernity by expressing political resistance and affiliation through the idiom of reproduction.
本文考察了生活在印度达兰萨拉的藏人难民叙事中的生殖隐喻。在理解他们的个人历史时,藏人难民援引了一个与西藏人权文献相呼应的集体故事。女性通过流亡政府和医疗机构表达的政治话语,接触到这种文学。文章追溯了这个话语中与生殖密切相关的方面。关于生殖的政治话语将多育主义表述为解决难民社区对生存问题的关注的一种方法,并且通过中国的生殖法规,将现代性定义为一个暴力场所。然而,藏人难民在讨论自己自由的生殖决策时,也使用了现代性的概念,将现代生殖干预置于与印度社会相对立的位置。本文通过生殖这一惯用表达,展示了藏人难民通过表达政治抵抗和认同来驾驭现代性的相互竞争的形象。