• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a new automated homogeneous PCR assay, GenomEra C. difficile, for rapid detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in fecal specimens.评价一种新型自动化均相 PCR 检测法,GenomEra C. difficile,用于快速检测粪便标本中的产毒艰难梭菌。
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Sep;51(9):2908-12. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01083-13. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
2
Prospective Evaluation of the mariPOC Test for Detection of Clostridioides difficile Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxins A/B.用于检测艰难梭菌谷氨酸脱氢酶及毒素A/B的mariPOC检测的前瞻性评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Mar 25;58(4). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01872-19.
3
Evaluation of the fully automated BD MAX Cdiff and Xpert C. difficile assays for direct detection of Clostridium difficile in stool specimens.评估 BD MAX Cdiff 和 Xpert C. difficile 全自动检测系统在粪便样本中直接检测艰难梭菌的性能。
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jun;51(6):1906-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00344-13. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
4
Evaluation of a new molecular test, the BD Max Cdiff, for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in fecal samples.评估一种新的分子检测方法,BD Max Cdiff,用于检测粪便样本中的产毒艰难梭菌。
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Sep;50(9):3089-90. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01250-12. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
5
Impact of strain type on detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of molecular diagnostic and enzyme immunoassay approaches.菌株类型对产毒艰难梭菌检测的影响:分子诊断与酶免疫分析方法的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Oct;48(10):3719-24. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00427-10. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
6
Automated detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in clinical samples: isothermal tcdB amplification coupled to array-based detection.临床样本中产毒艰难梭菌的自动化检测:基于芯片的 tcdB 等温扩增与检测方法的耦联。
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Aug;50(8):2681-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00621-12. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
7
Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff and Seegene Seeplex ACE PCR assays using toxigenic Clostridium difficile culture for direct detection of tcdB from stool specimens.使用产毒艰难梭菌培养物直接检测粪便标本中 tcdB 的 BD GeneOhm Cdiff 和 Seegene Seeplex ACE PCR 检测比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Nov;50(11):3765-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01440-12. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
8
Multicenter evaluation of the Verigene Clostridium difficile nucleic acid assay.艰难梭菌核酸检测试剂盒(Verigene)的多中心评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Dec;51(12):4120-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01690-13. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
9
Loop-mediated isothermal amplification compared to real-time PCR and enzyme immunoassay for toxigenic Clostridium difficile detection.环介导等温扩增与实时 PCR 和酶免疫分析检测产毒艰难梭菌的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Mar;50(3):640-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01014-11. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
10
Evaluation of tcdB real-time PCR in a three-step diagnostic algorithm for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.评价 tcdB 实时 PCR 在产毒艰难梭菌三步诊断算法中的应用。
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Jan;48(1):124-30. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00734-09. Epub 2009 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Case report of clostridium difficile infection after rectal resection with ileostomy.回肠造口术后直肠切除术后艰难梭菌感染的病例报告。
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar 1;23(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03713-5.
2
Prospective Evaluation of the mariPOC Test for Detection of Clostridioides difficile Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxins A/B.用于检测艰难梭菌谷氨酸脱氢酶及毒素A/B的mariPOC检测的前瞻性评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Mar 25;58(4). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01872-19.
3
A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) and Algorithms Including NAATs for the Diagnosis of () in Adults.一项关于核酸扩增检测(NAATs)和包括 NAATs 在内的算法在诊断成人()中的实验室医学最佳实践系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019 May 29;32(3). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00032-18. Print 2019 Jun 19.
4
Comparison of BD Max Cdiff and GenomEra C. difficile molecular assays for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile from stools in conventional sample containers and in FecalSwabs.BD Max艰难梭菌检测法与GenomEra艰难梭菌分子检测法在常规样本容器及粪便拭子中粪便样本中产毒艰难梭菌检测方面的比较
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 May;34(5):1005-9. doi: 10.1007/s10096-015-2320-2. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
5
Comparison of GenomEra C. difficile and Xpert C. difficile as confirmatory tests in a multistep algorithm for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.在艰难梭菌感染诊断的多步骤算法中,将GenomEra艰难梭菌检测法与Xpert艰难梭菌检测法作为确证试验进行比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Jan;53(1):332-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03093-14. Epub 2014 Nov 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of an algorithmic approach in comparison with the Illumigene assay for laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.评价一种算法方法与 Illumigene 检测在艰难梭菌感染实验室诊断中的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Apr;51(4):1152-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03203-12. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
2
Length of stay and mortality due to Clostridium difficile infection acquired in the intensive care unit.因在重症监护病房获得的艰难梭菌感染导致的住院时间和死亡率。
J Crit Care. 2013 Aug;28(4):335-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.11.008. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
3
Five years experience of Clostridium difficile infection in children at a UK tertiary hospital: proposed criteria for diagnosis and management.英国一家三甲医院儿童艰难梭菌感染 5 年经验:诊断和管理的建议标准。
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051728. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
4
Performance of Clostridium difficile toxin enzyme immunoassay and nucleic acid amplification tests stratified by patient disease severity.按患者疾病严重程度分层的艰难梭菌毒素酶免疫分析和核酸扩增检测的性能。
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Mar;51(3):869-73. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02970-12. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
5
Overcoming barriers to effective recognition and diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.克服有效识别和诊断艰难梭菌感染的障碍。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 Dec;18 Suppl 6:13-20. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12057.
6
Predicting recurrence of C. difficile colitis using bacterial virulence factors: binary toxin is the key.使用细菌毒力因子预测艰难梭菌相关性结肠炎的复发:二进制毒素是关键。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Jan;17(1):118-24; discussion p.124-5. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2056-6. Epub 2012 Oct 20.
7
Multicenter clinical evaluation of the portrait toxigenic C. difficile assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile strains in clinical stool specimens.多中心临床评估 portrait 产毒梭状芽孢杆菌检测试剂盒,用于检测临床粪便标本中的产毒艰难梭菌。
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Dec;50(12):3932-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02083-12. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
8
Comparison of antigen and two molecular methods for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins.用于检测艰难梭菌毒素的抗原法与两种分子方法的比较
Scand J Infect Dis. 2013 Jan;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2012.708780. Epub 2012 Sep 21.
9
Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff and Seegene Seeplex ACE PCR assays using toxigenic Clostridium difficile culture for direct detection of tcdB from stool specimens.使用产毒艰难梭菌培养物直接检测粪便标本中 tcdB 的 BD GeneOhm Cdiff 和 Seegene Seeplex ACE PCR 检测比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Nov;50(11):3765-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01440-12. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
10
Clostridium difficile carriage in healthy infants in the community: a potential reservoir for pathogenic strains.社区健康婴儿中产艰难梭菌定植:潜在的致病性菌株储库。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Nov;55(9):1209-15. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis637. Epub 2012 Jul 25.

评价一种新型自动化均相 PCR 检测法,GenomEra C. difficile,用于快速检测粪便标本中的产毒艰难梭菌。

Evaluation of a new automated homogeneous PCR assay, GenomEra C. difficile, for rapid detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in fecal specimens.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Sep;51(9):2908-12. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01083-13. Epub 2013 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1128/JCM.01083-13
PMID:23804386
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3754623/
Abstract

We evaluated a new automated homogeneous PCR assay to detect toxigenic Clostridium difficile, the GenomEra C. difficile assay (Abacus Diagnostica, Finland), with 310 diarrheal stool specimens and with a collection of 33 known clostridial and nonclostridial isolates. Results were compared with toxigenic culture results, with discrepancies being resolved by the GeneXpert C. difficile PCR assay (Cepheid). Among the 80 toxigenic culture-positive or GeneXpert C. difficile assay-positive fecal specimens, 79 were also positive with the GenomEra C. difficile assay. Additionally, one specimen was positive with the GenomEra assay but negative with the confirmatory methods. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity were 98.8% and 99.6%, respectively. With the culture collection, no false-positive or -negative results were observed. The analytical sensitivity of the GenomEra C. difficile assay was approximately 5 CFU per PCR test. The short hands-on (<5 min for 1 to 4 samples) and total turnaround (<1 h) times, together with the high positive and negative predictive values (98.8% and 99.6%, respectively), make the GenomEra C. difficile assay an excellent option for toxigenic C. difficile detection in fecal specimens.

摘要

我们评估了一种新的自动化聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测方法,用于检测产毒艰难梭菌,即 GenomEra C. difficile 检测法(芬兰 Abacus Diagnostica 公司),共检测了 310 份腹泻粪便标本和 33 株已知的梭菌和非梭菌分离株。结果与产毒培养结果进行了比较,通过 GeneXpert C. difficile PCR 检测法(Cepheid)解决了差异。在 80 份产毒培养阳性或 GeneXpert C. difficile 检测阳性的粪便标本中,79 份也与 GenomEra C. difficile 检测法呈阳性。此外,有一份标本与 GenomEra 检测法呈阳性,但与确认方法呈阴性。因此,该检测法的灵敏度和特异性分别为 98.8%和 99.6%。使用培养物集,未观察到假阳性或假阴性结果。GenomEra C. difficile 检测法的分析灵敏度约为每 PCR 检测 5 个 CFU。操作简单(1 至 4 个样本的操作时间<5 分钟),总周转时间(<1 小时)短,且阳性和阴性预测值高(分别为 98.8%和 99.6%),使得 GenomEra C. difficile 检测法成为粪便标本中产毒艰难梭菌检测的绝佳选择。