Alcalá Luis, Reigadas Elena, Marín Mercedes, Fernández-Chico Antonia, Catalán Pilar, Bouza Emilio
Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES CB06/06/0058), Madrid, Spain
Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Jan;53(1):332-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03093-14. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
We compared two multistep diagnostic algorithms based on C. Diff Quik Chek Complete and, as confirmatory tests, GenomEra C. difficile and Xpert C. difficile. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 87.2%, 99.7%, 97.1%, and 98.3%, respectively, for the GenomEra-based algorithm and 89.7%, 99.4%, 95.5%, and 98.6%, respectively, for the Xpert-based algorithm. GenomEra represents an alternative to Xpert as a confirmatory test of a multistep algorithm for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) diagnosis.
我们比较了两种基于艰难梭菌快速检测全项(C. Diff Quik Chek Complete)的多步骤诊断算法,并将GenomEra艰难梭菌检测和Xpert艰难梭菌检测作为确证试验。基于GenomEra的算法,其灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为87.2%、99.7%、97.1%和98.3%;基于Xpert的算法,其灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为89.7%、99.4%、95.5%和98.6%。GenomEra可作为Xpert的替代方法,用于艰难梭菌感染(CDI)诊断多步骤算法的确证试验。