Suppr超能文献

原发性腭裂修复术结局的术前风险因素的前瞻性分析。

Prospective analysis of presurgical risk factors for outcomes in primary palatoplasty.

机构信息

Toronto, Ontario, Canada From the Department of Surgery, The University of Toronto Division of Plastic Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jul;132(1):165-171. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182910acb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The authors present a single surgeon's series of primary palatoplasty over a 10-year period in order to determine which presurgical factors might influence postoperative fistula rate and speech outcome.

METHODS

Data were prospectively acquired for all patients undergoing primary palatoplasty between January of 2000 and January of 2010. Standard demographic data were captured together with classification of cleft type and severity (as defined by palate length and cleft width). Outcome data were assessed in terms of fistula rate and the requirement for secondary speech surgery for velopharyngeal insufficiency.

RESULTS

There were 485 primary procedures; 276 patients were male. Mean age at primary surgery was 20.4 months. Clefts were classified according to Kernahan and Stark (cleft palate, n = 260; cleft lip/palate, n = 225) and Veau class (I, n = 85; II, n = 175; III, n = 165; and IV, n = 60). Palate length was assessed according to Randall's classification (I, n = 81; II, n = 319; III, n = 58; IV, n = 2). Mean palate width was 7.7 mm (range, 0 to 19 mm). Cleft lip/palate was associated with wider mean cleft width and a higher incidence of shorter palates than cleft palate. Velopharyngeal insufficiency was more frequent in cleft lip/palate than in cleft palate. Male sex, greater cleft width, and shorter palate length were independent predictors of velopharyngeal insufficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Distributions of sex, cleft width, and palate length vary among the differing cleft types and may explain some of the variation in outcomes among centers and protocols. These data should be recorded to facilitate valid comparisons among future studies.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

摘要

背景

作者报告了一位外科医生在 10 年内进行的一系列初次腭裂修复术,旨在确定哪些术前因素可能影响术后瘘管发生率和语音结果。

方法

前瞻性采集 2000 年 1 月至 2010 年 1 月期间所有接受初次腭裂修复术患者的数据。收集标准人口统计学数据,同时对腭裂类型和严重程度(根据腭长度和裂隙宽度进行分类)进行分类。根据瘘管发生率和需要二次语音手术治疗腭咽闭合不全评估结局数据。

结果

共有 485 例初次手术;276 例为男性。初次手术时的平均年龄为 20.4 个月。腭裂根据 Kernahan 和 Stark(腭裂,n = 260;唇裂/腭裂,n = 225)和 Veau 分类(I 型,n = 85;II 型,n = 175;III 型,n = 165;IV 型,n = 60)进行分类。腭长度根据 Randall 分类(I 型,n = 81;II 型,n = 319;III 型,n = 58;IV 型,n = 2)进行评估。平均腭宽度为 7.7mm(范围 0 至 19mm)。唇裂/腭裂的平均裂隙宽度较宽,腭长度较短。腭裂的发生率较高。与腭裂相比,唇裂/腭裂更常发生腭咽闭合不全。男性、较大的裂隙宽度和较短的腭长度是腭咽闭合不全的独立预测因素。

结论

不同腭裂类型之间的性别、裂隙宽度和腭长度分布不同,可能解释了不同中心和方案之间结局的一些差异。这些数据应记录下来,以便于未来研究之间进行有效的比较。

临床问题/证据水平:风险,III 级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验