Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Endoscopy. 2013 Aug;45(8):605-18. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326640. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
Cannulation techniques are recognized to be important in causing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). However, considerable controversy exists about the usefulness of the guide wire-assisted cannulation technique for the prevention of PEP. This systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to compare the guide wire-assisted cannulation technique with the contrast-assisted cannulation technique.
CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and abstracts from Digestive Disease Week and the United European Gastroenterology Week were searched up to February 2012 for RCTs comparing the guide wire-assisted ERCP cannulation technique with the conventional contrast-assisted ERCP cannulation technique. The risk of bias was assessed, and outcomes were pooled by meta-analysis (random-effects model). The primary outcome measure was PEP. Secondary outcome measures included severity of PEP, primary common bile duct (CBD) cannulation success, overall CBD cannulation success, precut sphincterotomy, and other ERCP-related complications.
In total, 12 RCTs (3450 patients) were included. The guide wire-assisted cannulation technique significantly reduced PEP compared with the contrast-assisted cannulation technique (risk ratio [RR] 0.51, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.32 - 0.82). In addition, the guide wire-assisted cannulation technique was associated with greater primary cannulation success (RR 1.07, 95 %CI 1.00 - 1.15), fewer precut sphincterotomies (RR 0.75, 95 %CI 0.60 - 0.95), and no increase in other ERCP-related complications. Subgroup analyses indicated that this significant risk reduction in PEP with the guide wire-assisted cannulation technique existed only in "non-crossover" trials (RR 0.22, 95 %CI 0.12 - 0.42). The results were robust in sensitivity analyses.
Compared with the contrast-assisted cannulation technique, the guide wire-assisted cannulation technique increases the primary cannulation rate and reduces the risk of PEP, and therefore appears to be the most appropriate first-line cannulation technique.
内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)后胰腺炎(PEP)的发生与插管技术密切相关。然而,导丝辅助插管技术在预防 PEP 中的作用仍存在较大争议。本系统评价旨在比较导丝辅助插管技术与对比剂辅助插管技术。
通过 CENTRAL、MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL 以及 2012 年 2 月前消化疾病周和欧洲联合胃肠病周摘要,检索比较导丝辅助 ERCP 插管技术与传统对比剂辅助 ERCP 插管技术的随机对照试验(RCT)。采用偏倚风险评估,并进行荟萃分析(随机效应模型)。主要观察指标为 PEP。次要观察指标包括 PEP 严重程度、主胰管(CBD)首次插管成功率、CBD 总插管成功率、预切开括约肌切开术和其他 ERCP 相关并发症。
共纳入 12 项 RCT(3450 例患者)。与对比剂辅助插管技术相比,导丝辅助插管技术可显著降低 PEP 的发生率(风险比 [RR] 0.51,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.32 - 0.82)。此外,导丝辅助插管技术还与更高的首次插管成功率(RR 1.07,95%CI 1.00 - 1.15)、更少的预切开括约肌切开术(RR 0.75,95%CI 0.60 - 0.95)相关,且不增加其他 ERCP 相关并发症。亚组分析表明,导丝辅助插管技术在非交叉 RCT 中降低 PEP 风险的作用更为显著(RR 0.22,95%CI 0.12 - 0.42)。敏感性分析结果稳健。
与对比剂辅助插管技术相比,导丝辅助插管技术可提高首次插管成功率,降低 PEP 风险,因此似乎是最合适的一线插管技术。