Suppr超能文献

双导丝技术在预防 ERCP 术后胰腺炎中的应用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Double-guidewire technique in difficult biliary cannulation for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

McGill University and McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2017 Jan;49(1):15-26. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-119035. Epub 2016 Dec 20.

Abstract

Difficult cannulation is a risk factor for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The double-guidewire technique (DGT) may improve cannulation success and reduce the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in patients with difficult cannulation. This systematic review compared the DGT with persistent conventional cannulation or other advanced techniques in patients with difficult cannulation.  CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases and DDW and UEGW abstracts up to March 2016 were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DGT with persistent conventional cannulation or other advanced techniques (precut, pancreatic duct [PD] stenting). The primary outcome was PEP. Secondary outcomes included severity of PEP, successful cannulation of the common bile duct (CBD) with the randomized technique, overall CBD cannulation success, and ERCP-related complications.  7 RCTs (577 patients) were included. Use of the DGT significantly increased PEP compared to other endoscopic techniques (risk ratio [RR] 1.98, 95 % confidence interval [95 %CI] 1.14 - 3.42). There was no significant difference in CBD cannulation success with the randomized technique (RR 1.04, 95 %CI 0.87 - 1.24) or in overall cannulation success (RR 1.04, 95 %CI 0.91 - 1.18) between DGT and other techniques. There was also no significant difference in the risk of other ERCP-related complications (bleeding, perforation, cholangitis, and mortality). The results were robust in sensitivity analyses.  In patients with difficult cannulation, sole use of the DGT appears to increase the risk of PEP without any superiority in achieving biliary cannulation compared to other techniques. PD stenting may reduce the risk of PEP when the DGT is used. The influence of co-intervention in the form of per-procedural nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) administration is unclear.

摘要

困难的插管是内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)后胰腺炎的一个危险因素。双导丝技术(DGT)可能提高插管成功率,降低困难插管患者 ERCP 后胰腺炎(PEP)的风险。本系统评价比较了 DGT 与持续常规插管或其他先进技术在困难插管患者中的应用。CENTRAL、MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 CINAHL 数据库以及 DDW 和 UEGW 摘要截止到 2016 年 3 月,检索了比较 DGT 与持续常规插管或其他先进技术(预切开、胰管 [PD]支架)的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局为 PEP。次要结局包括 PEP 的严重程度、随机技术下胆总管(CBD)的成功插管、整体 CBD 插管成功率和 ERCP 相关并发症。7 项 RCT(577 例患者)纳入分析。与其他内镜技术相比,DGT 的使用显著增加了 PEP 的风险(风险比 [RR] 1.98,95%置信区间 [95%CI] 1.14-3.42)。随机技术下 CBD 插管成功率(RR 1.04,95%CI 0.87-1.24)或整体插管成功率(RR 1.04,95%CI 0.91-1.18)在 DGT 与其他技术之间无显著差异。DGT 与其他技术之间其他 ERCP 相关并发症(出血、穿孔、胆管炎和死亡率)的风险也无显著差异。敏感性分析结果稳健。在困难插管患者中,单独使用 DGT 似乎会增加 PEP 的风险,而与其他技术相比,在实现胆管插管方面没有优势。当使用 DGT 时,PD 支架可能会降低 PEP 的风险。DGT 过程中使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)的影响尚不清楚。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验