Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:839-45. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S40503. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
A significant number of mania patients fail to respond to current pharmacotherapy, thereby there is need for novel augmentation strategies. The results of some early studies showed the effectiveness of cholinomimetics in the treatment of mania. One open case series suggested the efficacy of donepezil in the treatment of bipolar disorder. Our aim was to explore whether an oral cholinesterase inhibitor, donepezil, administered during a 4-week treatment period, would benefit patients with acute mania.
We conducted a 4-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil as an adjunctive treatment to lithium in patients with acute mania. Eligible subjects were randomly assigned to receive donepezil or placebo in addition to lithium. Donepezil was started at 5 mg/day, and increased to 10 mg/day in the first week. Patients were rated with the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) at baseline, day 1, week 1, week 2, and week 4.
Out of the 30 patients who were enrolled, 15 were on donepezil and 15 were on placebo. All patients completed the 4-week trial. On the first day, there was a difference of 1.97 units on the psychomotor symptoms scale of the YMRS in the donepezil group as compared to the placebo group (t = 2.39, P = 0.02). There was a difference of 0.57 units (t = 2.09, P = 0.04) in the speech item and a difference of 0.29 units in the sexual interest item (t = 2.11, P = 0.04) in the donepezil group as compared to the placebo group. The total YMRS difference on the first day approached the conventional significance level (1.97 units, t = 1.84, P = 0.07). Over the course of 4 weeks, we failed to find that donepezil produced any significant difference in the YMRS (6.71 units difference, t = -1.44, P = 0.16) or the BPRS scale (1.29 units difference, t = -0.33, P = 0.75) as compared to placebo. Ten subjects (66.67%) in both groups met the criteria for clinical response (Fisher's exact P = 1.00). Five subjects (33.33%) in the donepezil group met the criteria for clinical remission while nine subjects (60.00%) in the placebo group met the remission criteria (Fisher's exact P = 0.27).
Use of the oral anticholinergic donepezil had some benefit in the augmentation of lithium treatment on the first day, but did not provide any significant benefits in the long-term.
相当数量的躁狂症患者对当前的药物治疗没有反应,因此需要新的增效策略。一些早期研究的结果表明,拟胆碱能药物在治疗躁狂症方面有效。一项开放病例系列研究表明,多奈哌齐在治疗双相情感障碍方面有效。我们的目的是探讨口服乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂多奈哌齐在 4 周治疗期间是否会使急性躁狂症患者受益。
我们进行了一项为期 4 周的双盲、安慰剂对照试验,研究多奈哌齐作为锂的辅助治疗急性躁狂症。符合条件的受试者被随机分配接受锂加多奈哌齐或安慰剂。多奈哌齐起始剂量为 5mg/天,第 1 周增加至 10mg/天。患者在基线、第 1 天、第 1 周、第 2 周和第 4 周时使用 Young 躁狂评定量表(YMRS)和简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)进行评分。
30 名入组患者中,15 名服用多奈哌齐,15 名服用安慰剂。所有患者均完成了 4 周的试验。第 1 天,多奈哌齐组的 YMRS 精神运动症状量表评分比安慰剂组高 1.97 分(t = 2.39,P = 0.02)。多奈哌齐组的言语项目评分差异为 0.57 分(t = 2.09,P = 0.04),性兴趣项目评分差异为 0.29 分(t = 2.11,P = 0.04)。第 1 天的总 YMRS 差异接近常规显著性水平(1.97 分,t = 1.84,P = 0.07)。在 4 周的治疗过程中,我们发现多奈哌齐在 YMRS(6.71 分差异,t = -1.44,P = 0.16)或 BPRS 量表(1.29 分差异,t = -0.33,P = 0.75)方面与安慰剂相比均无显著差异。两组中均有 10 名(66.67%)受试者符合临床反应标准(Fisher 确切概率 P = 1.00)。多奈哌齐组 5 名(33.33%)受试者符合临床缓解标准,安慰剂组 9 名(60.00%)受试者符合缓解标准(Fisher 确切概率 P = 0.27)。
口服抗胆碱能药物多奈哌齐在锂治疗的第 1 天有一定的增效作用,但在长期治疗中没有提供显著的益处。