Suppr超能文献

一项为期 4 周的、随机的、双盲安慰剂对照研究,评估多奈哌齐增强锂治疗急性躁狂的疗效。

A randomized, 4-week double-blind placebo control study on the efficacy of donepezil augmentation of lithium for treatment of acute mania.

机构信息

Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:839-45. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S40503. Epub 2013 Jun 17.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A significant number of mania patients fail to respond to current pharmacotherapy, thereby there is need for novel augmentation strategies. The results of some early studies showed the effectiveness of cholinomimetics in the treatment of mania. One open case series suggested the efficacy of donepezil in the treatment of bipolar disorder. Our aim was to explore whether an oral cholinesterase inhibitor, donepezil, administered during a 4-week treatment period, would benefit patients with acute mania.

METHODS

We conducted a 4-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil as an adjunctive treatment to lithium in patients with acute mania. Eligible subjects were randomly assigned to receive donepezil or placebo in addition to lithium. Donepezil was started at 5 mg/day, and increased to 10 mg/day in the first week. Patients were rated with the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) at baseline, day 1, week 1, week 2, and week 4.

RESULTS

Out of the 30 patients who were enrolled, 15 were on donepezil and 15 were on placebo. All patients completed the 4-week trial. On the first day, there was a difference of 1.97 units on the psychomotor symptoms scale of the YMRS in the donepezil group as compared to the placebo group (t = 2.39, P = 0.02). There was a difference of 0.57 units (t = 2.09, P = 0.04) in the speech item and a difference of 0.29 units in the sexual interest item (t = 2.11, P = 0.04) in the donepezil group as compared to the placebo group. The total YMRS difference on the first day approached the conventional significance level (1.97 units, t = 1.84, P = 0.07). Over the course of 4 weeks, we failed to find that donepezil produced any significant difference in the YMRS (6.71 units difference, t = -1.44, P = 0.16) or the BPRS scale (1.29 units difference, t = -0.33, P = 0.75) as compared to placebo. Ten subjects (66.67%) in both groups met the criteria for clinical response (Fisher's exact P = 1.00). Five subjects (33.33%) in the donepezil group met the criteria for clinical remission while nine subjects (60.00%) in the placebo group met the remission criteria (Fisher's exact P = 0.27).

CONCLUSION

Use of the oral anticholinergic donepezil had some benefit in the augmentation of lithium treatment on the first day, but did not provide any significant benefits in the long-term.

摘要

简介

相当数量的躁狂症患者对当前的药物治疗没有反应,因此需要新的增效策略。一些早期研究的结果表明,拟胆碱能药物在治疗躁狂症方面有效。一项开放病例系列研究表明,多奈哌齐在治疗双相情感障碍方面有效。我们的目的是探讨口服乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂多奈哌齐在 4 周治疗期间是否会使急性躁狂症患者受益。

方法

我们进行了一项为期 4 周的双盲、安慰剂对照试验,研究多奈哌齐作为锂的辅助治疗急性躁狂症。符合条件的受试者被随机分配接受锂加多奈哌齐或安慰剂。多奈哌齐起始剂量为 5mg/天,第 1 周增加至 10mg/天。患者在基线、第 1 天、第 1 周、第 2 周和第 4 周时使用 Young 躁狂评定量表(YMRS)和简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)进行评分。

结果

30 名入组患者中,15 名服用多奈哌齐,15 名服用安慰剂。所有患者均完成了 4 周的试验。第 1 天,多奈哌齐组的 YMRS 精神运动症状量表评分比安慰剂组高 1.97 分(t = 2.39,P = 0.02)。多奈哌齐组的言语项目评分差异为 0.57 分(t = 2.09,P = 0.04),性兴趣项目评分差异为 0.29 分(t = 2.11,P = 0.04)。第 1 天的总 YMRS 差异接近常规显著性水平(1.97 分,t = 1.84,P = 0.07)。在 4 周的治疗过程中,我们发现多奈哌齐在 YMRS(6.71 分差异,t = -1.44,P = 0.16)或 BPRS 量表(1.29 分差异,t = -0.33,P = 0.75)方面与安慰剂相比均无显著差异。两组中均有 10 名(66.67%)受试者符合临床反应标准(Fisher 确切概率 P = 1.00)。多奈哌齐组 5 名(33.33%)受试者符合临床缓解标准,安慰剂组 9 名(60.00%)受试者符合缓解标准(Fisher 确切概率 P = 0.27)。

结论

口服抗胆碱能药物多奈哌齐在锂治疗的第 1 天有一定的增效作用,但在长期治疗中没有提供显著的益处。

相似文献

2
A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of adjunctive donepezil in treatment-resistant mania.
Bipolar Disord. 2006 Feb;8(1):75-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2006.00243.x.
3
[Antipsychotics in bipolar disorders].
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):417-24. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95456-5.
5
Rates of remission/euthymia with quetiapine in combination with lithium/divalproex for the treatment of acute mania.
J Affect Disord. 2007;100 Suppl 1:S55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.02.008. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
6
Olanzapine versus lithium in the acute treatment of bipolar mania: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.
J Affect Disord. 2008 Jan;105(1-3):101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.04.020. Epub 2007 May 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment options for acute mania.
Eur Psychiatry. 2003 Dec;18 Suppl 1:13s-18s. doi: 10.1016/s0924-9338(03)80011-1.
2
The science and practice of lithium therapy.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;46(3):192-211. doi: 10.1177/0004867412437346.
3
Lithium: still a major option in the management of bipolar disorder.
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2012 Mar;18(3):219-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2011.00260.x. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
4
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antimanic drugs in acute mania: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis.
Lancet. 2011 Oct 8;378(9799):1306-15. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60873-8. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
5
Efficacy of antimanic treatments: meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011 Jan;36(2):375-89. doi: 10.1038/npp.2010.192. Epub 2010 Oct 27.
7
Advantages and disadvantages of combination treatment with antipsychotics ECNP Consensus Meeting, March 2008, Nice.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009 Jul;19(7):520-32. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2009.04.003. Epub 2009 May 2.
8
Treatment of bipolar disorder: a systematic review of available data and clinical perspectives.
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008 Nov;11(7):999-1029. doi: 10.1017/S1461145708009231. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
9
Magnitude of effect of lithium in short-term efficacy studies of moderate to severe manic episode.
Bipolar Disord. 2007 Dec;9(8):793-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00445.x.
10
Lithium in mood disorders: increasing evidence base, declining use?
Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;191:474-6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.043133.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验