Suppr超能文献

autofluorescence 成像在受训者评估时识别非息肉样结直肠肿瘤性病变的准确性如何?一项初步研究。

What is the accuracy of autofluorescence imaging in identifying non-polypoid colorectal neoplastic lesions when reviewed by trainees? A pilot study.

机构信息

Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Dig Endosc. 2013 Jul;25(4):428-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01400.x. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms are difficult to identify using conventional white light (WL) colonoscopy. The aim of the present pilot study was to compare an autofluorescence imaging (AFI) system with conventional WL colonoscopy for the identification of non-polypoid neoplasms by trainees in a colonoscopic observational situation.

METHODS

We selected clear images with both AFI and WL in the same field taken by experts at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, from December 2009 to November 2010. One hundred and eighty sets of images (137 non-polypoid neoplasms and 43 without neoplasm) were selected. The images were reviewed by two trainees without AFI experience. After attending a short educational lecture on the AFI system, the reviewers determined the presence of lesions in the randomly arranged images. The accuracy of AFI and WL for identifying non-polypoid neoplasms by trainees was assessed.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity for identifying non-polypoid neoplasms by trainees was not significantly different between AFI and WL. However, the specificity tended to be lower in AFI images than in WL images.

CONCLUSIONS

False-positive results tended to be more frequent for the AFI images than for the WL images. Further improvements in the technology and resolution are necessary for the AFI system to be useful for the detection of colorectal neoplasms. At present, clinical application of the AFI system may require more extensive structured training to improve its accuracy in the identification of non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms.

摘要

背景与目的

传统白光(WL)结肠镜检查难以识别非息肉样结直肠肿瘤。本初步研究的目的是比较自发荧光成像(AFI)系统与传统 WL 结肠镜检查,由受训者在结肠镜观察环境下识别非息肉样肿瘤。

方法

我们选择了东京国家癌症中心医院的专家在 2009 年 12 月至 2010 年 11 月期间使用同一视野拍摄的具有 AFI 和 WL 的清晰图像。选择了 180 组图像(137 个非息肉样肿瘤和 43 个无肿瘤)。两名没有 AFI 经验的受训者对这些图像进行了回顾。在参加了关于 AFI 系统的简短教育讲座后,审阅者根据随机排列的图像确定病变的存在。评估了受训者使用 AFI 和 WL 识别非息肉样肿瘤的准确性。

结果

受训者识别非息肉样肿瘤时,AFI 和 WL 的敏感性和特异性无显著差异。然而,AFI 图像的特异性似乎低于 WL 图像。

结论

与 WL 图像相比,AFI 图像的假阳性结果往往更为频繁。AFI 系统需要进一步改进技术和分辨率,才能有助于结直肠肿瘤的检测。目前,AFI 系统的临床应用可能需要更广泛的结构化培训,以提高其识别非息肉样结直肠肿瘤的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验