Suppr超能文献

帽辅助水浸法用于最小镇静结肠镜检查:前瞻性、随机、单中心试验。

Cap-assisted water immersion for minimal sedation colonoscopy: prospective, randomized, single-center trial.

机构信息

Digestive Diseases Center, Vítkovice Hospital, Ostrava, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Dig Endosc. 2013 Jul;25(4):434-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01402.x. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Water immersion insertion is able to reduce discomfort and need for sedation during colonoscopy. A cap attached to the colonoscope tip may improve insertion during air insufflation colonoscopy. According to several reports, both techniques alone may result in higher detection of neoplastic lesions. Our study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of cap-assisted water immersion compared to water immersion colonoscopy in minimally sedated patients.

METHODS

A total of 208 consecutive outpatients were randomized to either cap-assisted water immersion (Cap Water) or water immersion colonoscopy (Water). The primary endpoint was cecal intubation time.

RESULTS

Cecal intubation time was 6.9 ± 2.9 min in Cap Water and 7.4 ± 4.2 min in the Water arm (P = 0.73). Success rate of minimal sedation colonoscopy was equal in both groups (92.9%, P = 1.00). From the endoscopist's point of view, there were non-significant trends towards lower discomfort (P = 0.06), less need for abdominal compression (P = 0.06) and lower difficulty score (P = 0.05) during Cap Water colonoscopy. Adenoma detection rate was similar in both arms (44% in Cap Water vs 45% in the Water group, P = 0.88). There were no complications recorded in the present study.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with water immersion without cap, cap-assisted water immersion colonoscopy was not able to shorten the cecal intubation time. However, it has the possibility of reducing patient discomfort and difficulty of colonoscope insertion. Potential impact on improved detection of neoplastic lesions has to be evaluated by further studies.

摘要

背景与目的

水浸式插入法可减轻结肠镜检查时的不适和镇静需求。在结肠镜前端安装一个盖子,可能有助于在充气结肠镜检查时插入。根据多项报道,这两种技术单独使用可能会提高对肿瘤性病变的检出率。我们的研究旨在评估带帽水浸式与水浸式结肠镜检查在接受最低镇静的患者中的疗效。

方法

共 208 例连续门诊患者随机分为带帽水浸组(Cap Water)和水浸结肠镜组(Water)。主要终点是盲肠插管时间。

结果

Cap Water 组盲肠插管时间为 6.9±2.9 分钟,Water 组为 7.4±4.2 分钟(P=0.73)。两组最小镇静结肠镜检查的成功率相同(92.9%,P=1.00)。从内镜医生的角度来看,Cap Water 结肠镜检查时的不适感(P=0.06)、腹部按压需求(P=0.06)和难度评分(P=0.05)呈显著下降趋势,但无统计学意义。两组腺瘤检出率相似(Cap Water 组 44%,Water 组 45%,P=0.88)。本研究未记录到任何并发症。

结论

与不带帽的水浸式相比,带帽水浸式结肠镜检查并不能缩短盲肠插管时间。但它有可能减轻患者的不适和结肠镜插入的难度。进一步的研究需要评估其对提高肿瘤性病变检出率的潜在影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验