Stein Claudia
University of Warwick, UK.
Bull Hist Med. 2013 Summer;87(2):198-224. doi: 10.1353/bhm.2013.0019.
This article investigates the historical method of Karl Sudhoff (1853- 1938), Germany's first professor of medical history. It argues that in order to understand his ideas more fully, we need to step outside the historiography of medical history and assess his methodology in relation to the norms and ideals of German academic history writing in general. The article demonstrates that the philology-based "critical method" of Leopold von Ranke (1795-1886) was central to Sudhoff's methodological thinking. It investigates the underlying philosophical and epistemological assumptions of Ranke's method, which tend to be less appreciated than his overt empiricism and explores how Sudhoff applied these to the new professionalizing subdiscipline of the history of medicine. The article argues that Sudhoff's concerns with the methodology of history, which involved a particular conception of the relationship between the human sciences and the medical sciences, offers compelling addresses to our times.
本文探讨了德国首位医学史教授卡尔·聚德霍夫(1853 - 1938)的史学方法。文章认为,为了更全面地理解他的思想,我们需要跳出医学史的史学编纂范畴,从德国学术史写作的一般规范和理念角度来评估他的方法论。文章表明,利奥波德·冯·兰克(1795 - 1886)基于语文学的“批判方法”是聚德霍夫方法论思想的核心。本文研究了兰克方法背后的哲学和认识论假设,这些假设往往不如他公开宣称的经验主义那样受到重视,并探讨了聚德霍夫如何将这些假设应用于医学史这一新兴的专业化子学科。文章认为,聚德霍夫对历史方法论的关注,其中涉及对人文科学与医学科学之间关系的特定概念,为我们这个时代提供了引人注目的探讨。