Vollgraff Matthew
NOMIS Fellow, eikones-Center for the Theory and History of the Image, University of Basel.
Ber Wiss. 2024 Dec;47(4):432-465. doi: 10.1002/bewi.202300014. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
Aby Warburg's Bilderatlas Mnemosyne, left unfinished in 1929, has attracted significant interest in recent decades. This essay offers a new interpretation of Warburg's "picture atlas," not in relation to modernist collage and photomontage, but as an heir to scientific pedagogical exhibitions of the late Wilhelmine period. It deals in particular with two "public enlightenment" shows curated by the Leipzig medical historian Karl Sudhoff, whose work Warburg admired and employed: the first on with the history of hygiene in Dresden in 1911, the second in Leipzig, three years later, on the development of scientific images. Like Warburg, Sudhoff appreciated artworks and artifacts as sources for the history of science and medicine. His exhibitions consisted of assemblages of photographic reproductions-some of which were provided by Warburg himself-and uncannily anticipate Mnemosyne in both form and content. By examining the exchange of materials and display methods between the two scholars, the article explores how their respective visual projects reflected deeper disagreements over the public role of science, the epistemic power of images, and the persistence of the irrational in the human psyche.
阿比·瓦尔堡未完成的《记忆女神图像志》于1929年搁置,近几十年来引发了广泛关注。本文对瓦尔堡的“图像志”提出了一种全新解读,并非将其与现代主义拼贴画和照片蒙太奇联系起来,而是视其为威廉明妮时代晚期科学教育展览的延续。文章特别探讨了由莱比锡医学史学家卡尔·苏多夫策划的两场“公众启蒙”展览,瓦尔堡对苏多夫的作品赞赏有加并加以借鉴:第一场是1911年在德累斯顿举办的卫生史展览,第二场是三年后在莱比锡举办的科学图像发展展览。与瓦尔堡一样,苏多夫将艺术品和手工艺品视为科学与医学史的资料来源。他的展览由摄影复制品组合而成,其中一些是瓦尔堡本人提供的,在形式和内容上都惊人地预示了《记忆女神图像志》。通过审视两位学者之间的材料交换和展示方法,本文探讨了他们各自的视觉项目如何反映出在科学的公共角色、图像的认知力量以及人类心理中非理性因素的持久性等问题上的深层分歧。