Kalyuzhin V V, Teplyakov A T, Pushnikova E Yu, Bespalova L D, Kalyuzhina E V, Kolesnikov R N
Ter Arkh. 2013;85(5):68-72.
To comparatively estimate the time course of changes in key metabolic parameters and quality of life (QL) in patients with coronary heart disease during 4-week therapy with atenolol and amlodipine.
The 4-week randomized open-label trial included 60 patients with functional classes II-III stable angina pectoris on exertion associated with metabolic syndrome (all male patients aged 29 to 62 years (mean age 48.1 +/- 0.9 years)). Along with the traditional studies accepted in specialized cardiology practice, QL was assessed using the EORTC QLO CORE 30 questionnaire prior to treatment and on the last day of the trial.
Four-week therapy with the individually adjusted dosages of atenolol (68.7 +/- 4.17 mg/day) or amlodipine (5.5 +/- 0.34 mg/ day) ensured comparable positive changes in the subjective assessment of QL.
The positive changes in exercise tolerance that was considered to be an objective indicator for physical improvement in the treatment with amlodipine were more pronounced than those in that with atenolol. Therapy with amlodipine caused no change in blood lipid parameters while that with atenolol was associated with a 9.7% increase in blood triglyceride concentrations.
比较评估冠心病患者在接受阿替洛尔和氨氯地平4周治疗期间关键代谢参数和生活质量(QL)的变化时间进程。
这项为期4周的随机开放标签试验纳入了60例患有与代谢综合征相关的II-III级劳力性稳定型心绞痛的患者(所有男性患者年龄在29至62岁之间(平均年龄48.1±0.9岁))。除了专科心脏病学实践中接受的传统研究外,在治疗前和试验的最后一天使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)QLO CORE 30问卷对生活质量进行评估。
使用阿替洛尔(68.7±4.17毫克/天)或氨氯地平(5.5±0.34毫克/天)的个体化调整剂量进行4周治疗,在生活质量的主观评估中确保了相当的积极变化。
氨氯地平治疗中被认为是身体改善客观指标的运动耐量的积极变化比阿替洛尔治疗中的更明显。氨氯地平治疗未引起血脂参数变化,而阿替洛尔治疗则使血甘油三酯浓度升高9.7%。