Suppr超能文献

临床黏结失败率的黏结剂预涂自锁托槽采用自酸蚀底胶。

Clinical bond failure rates of adhesive precoated self-ligating brackets using a self-etching primer.

机构信息

a  Associate Professor, Ondokuz Mayis University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Samsun, Turkey.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2014 Jan;84(1):155-60. doi: 10.2319/022013-149.1. Epub 2013 Jul 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To comparatively assess the failure rate of adhesive precoated (APC) self-ligating metal brackets bonded with two different enamel surface preparation techniques: self-etching primer (SEP) and conventional two-step etch and primer method (CM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-seven patients with complete permanent dentition were included in this study. A total of 1140 APC self-ligating brackets (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) were bonded using a split-mouth design. For each patient, SEP (Transbond Plus SEP, 3M Unitek) and CM (37% phosphoric acid) were used in alternate quadrants. All brackets were bonded by the same investigator after pumicing and rinsing of all of the teeth. The number, site, and date of first-time bracket failures were monitored throughout orthodontic treatment (mean, 22 months). The survival rates of the brackets were estimated by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests (P < .05). The adhesive remnant index was used to determine the bond failure interface.

RESULTS

The bond failure rates were 2.97% and 2.18% for the CM and SEP, respectively. No statistically significant difference in failure rates was found between the groups. The bond failure sites were predominantly at the enamel-adhesive interface in both groups.

CONCLUSION

This long-term in vivo study showed that the combined use of SEP and the APC bracket system can be used effectively for bonding brackets after pumicing the enamel surfaces in clinical orthodontics.

摘要

目的

比较评估两种不同牙釉质表面处理技术(自酸蚀底漆 [SEP] 和传统两步酸蚀和底漆法 [CM])粘结的预涂层(APC)自结扎金属托槽的失败率。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了 57 名具有完整恒牙列的患者。采用分口设计共粘结 1140 个 APC 自结扎托槽(3M Unitek,Monrovia,加利福尼亚州)。对于每个患者,交替象限使用 SEP(Transbond Plus SEP,3M Unitek)和 CM(37%磷酸)。所有托槽均由同一位研究者在所有牙齿喷砂和冲洗后粘结。在正畸治疗过程中(平均 22 个月)监测首次托槽脱落的数量、部位和日期。使用 Kaplan-Meier 和对数秩检验(P<0.05)估计托槽的存活率。使用黏附残余指数确定黏附失败界面。

结果

CM 和 SEP 的粘结失败率分别为 2.97%和 2.18%。两组间的失败率无统计学差异。两组的粘结失败部位均主要位于牙釉质-黏附界面。

结论

这项长期的体内研究表明,在临床正畸中喷砂牙釉质表面后,联合使用 SEP 和 APC 托槽系统可有效粘结托槽。

相似文献

1
Clinical bond failure rates of adhesive precoated self-ligating brackets using a self-etching primer.
Angle Orthod. 2014 Jan;84(1):155-60. doi: 10.2319/022013-149.1. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
3
Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Nov;140(5):696-702. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.02.027.
4
Effect of enamel protective agents on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
Prog Orthod. 2014 Jul 18;15(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0034-0.
5
Effect of a self-etching primer on shear bond strength of adhesive precoated brackets in vivo.
Angle Orthod. 2006 Jan;76(1):127-31. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0127:EOASPO]2.0.CO;2.
6
Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to amalgam with different intermediate resins and adhesives.
Eur J Orthod. 2009 Apr;31(2):207-12. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn086. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
7
Effect of loading mode on bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with 2 systems.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jan;129(1):60-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.020.
10
Eighteen-month bracket survival rate: conventional versus self-etch adhesive.
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Feb;30(1):94-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm089. Epub 2007 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

2
comparative assessment of bracket bond failure rates of single-component adhesives.
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2024 Apr 29;14(2):105-111. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_44_23. eCollection 2024 Mar-Apr.
4
Bracket Bond Failures: Incidence and Association with Different Risk Factors-A Retrospective Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 2;20(5):4452. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054452.
5
Shear Bond Strength and Mode of Failure of Polypropylene Fibers in Orthodontic Flash-Free Adhesive.
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Oct 4;14(19):4167. doi: 10.3390/polym14194167.
7
Adhesive Precoated Bracket: Is It Worth Using? Long-term Shear Bond Strength: An In Vitro Study.
Eur J Dent. 2022 Oct;16(4):841-847. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740224. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
8
Bracket Failure in Orthodontic Patients: The Incidence and the Influence of Different Factors.
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jan 11;2022:5128870. doi: 10.1155/2022/5128870. eCollection 2022.
9
A Clinical Comparison of Failure Rates of Metallic and Ceramic Brackets: A Twelve-Month Study.
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jan 10;2020:9725101. doi: 10.1155/2020/9725101. eCollection 2020.
10
Clinical performance of precoated brackets and self-etch bonding technique: a prospective comparative study.
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Jun;23(6):2813-2821. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2746-x. Epub 2018 Nov 30.

本文引用的文献

1
3
Bond failure rates with a self-etching primer: a randomized controlled trial.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jun;135(6):782-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.022.
4
12-month self-ligating bracket failure rate with a self-etching primer.
Angle Orthod. 2008 Nov;78(6):1095-100. doi: 10.2319/112507-552.1.
6
In-vivo prospective comparison of bond failure rates of 2 self-etching primer/adhesive systems.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Nov;132(5):671-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.12.008.
7
Eighteen-month bracket survival rate: conventional versus self-etch adhesive.
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Feb;30(1):94-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm089. Epub 2007 Nov 7.
8
A randomized clinical trial comparing 'one-step' and 'two-step' orthodontic bonding systems.
J Orthod. 2006 Dec;33(4):276-83; discussion 256-7. doi: 10.1179/146531205225021825.
9
A randomised clinical trial to investigate bond failure rates using a self-etching primer.
Eur J Orthod. 2006 Oct;28(5):444-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjl007. Epub 2006 Jun 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验