• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[风湿性疾病患者自助组织成员资格的心理关联]

[Psychological correlates of self-help group membership in patients with rheumatic diseases].

作者信息

Volle B, Wiedebusch S, Lohaus A

机构信息

Psychologisches Institut III der Universität Münster.

出版信息

Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 1990 Jun;40(6):230-7.

PMID:2382003
Abstract

This study focuses on the significance of psychological correlates of membership in self-help groups for rheumatic diseases. 138 patients suffering from rheumatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and arthrosis participated in the study. Self-help group members show specific control beliefs which differ from the non-self-help group members. They view the disease as more controllable by themselves (internal locus of control) and as less dependent on health professionals (powerful others health locus of control) and on fate or chance (chance locus of control). Further, self-help group members show more compliance and engagement in their treatment than non-self-help group members. In addition, they search for more information, for more sources of information and show better knowledge about the disease and about treatment which may also be a result of higher frequencies of conversations about the disease and about treatment reported by members of self-help groups. Self-help group members do not only speak more frequently about these topics, but such conversations are also more important in their estimation. Results further suggest a relation between self-help group membership and emotional variables.

摘要

本研究聚焦于参加风湿性疾病自助团体的心理关联因素的重要性。138名患有风湿性关节炎、强直性脊柱炎和关节病的患者参与了该研究。自助团体成员展现出与非自助团体成员不同的特定控制信念。他们认为疾病更能由自己掌控(内控点),对健康专业人员(权威他人健康控制点)和命运或机遇(机遇控制点)的依赖更小。此外,与非自助团体成员相比,自助团体成员在治疗中表现出更高的依从性和参与度。另外,他们会寻找更多信息、更多信息来源,并且对疾病和治疗有更深入的了解,这也可能是因为自助团体成员汇报的关于疾病和治疗的对话频率更高。自助团体成员不仅更频繁地谈论这些话题,而且在他们看来,此类对话也更为重要。研究结果进一步表明了加入自助团体与情绪变量之间的关系。

相似文献

1
[Psychological correlates of self-help group membership in patients with rheumatic diseases].[风湿性疾病患者自助组织成员资格的心理关联]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 1990 Jun;40(6):230-7.
2
[Personality structure of chronic rheumatically ill females].
Z Rheumatol. 1985 Jul-Aug;44(4):172-9.
3
[Psychological adjustment to disease in patients with ankylosing spondylitis].强直性脊柱炎患者对疾病的心理调适
Z Rheumatol. 1984 Nov-Dec;43(6):299-302.
4
[Rheumatic diseases in advanced age--psychological aspects].[老年风湿性疾病——心理层面]
Z Rheumatol. 1992 Nov-Dec;51(6):290-4.
5
[Do members of self-help groups know more about breast cancer?].[自助小组的成员对乳腺癌了解得更多吗?]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2006 Nov;56(11):432-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-951810.
6
[Control beliefs and patient compliance: an empirical study exemplified by adolescents with diabetes mellitus, bronchial asthma and alopecia areata].[控制信念与患者依从性:以患有糖尿病、支气管哮喘和斑秃的青少年为例的实证研究]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 1989 Jan;39(1):33-40.
7
Life change, irrational attitudes and disease impacts in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.强直性脊柱炎患者的生活变化、非理性态度及疾病影响
Int J Psychosom. 1993;40(1-4):77-83.
8
Self-help groups as mutual support: what do carers value?作为互助形式的自助团体:照顾者看重什么?
Health Soc Care Community. 2007 Jan;15(1):26-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00660.x.
9
Patient self-efficacy and health locus of control: relationships with health status and arthritis-related expenditure.患者自我效能感与健康控制点:与健康状况及关节炎相关支出的关系。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006 Jan;45(1):92-6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kei114. Epub 2005 Nov 15.
10
[Psychological classification of patients with ankylosing spondylitis].[强直性脊柱炎患者的心理分类]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 1994 Feb;44(2):65-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiple dimensions of health locus of control in a representative population sample: ordinal factor analysis and cross-validation of an existing three and a new four factor model.代表性人群样本中健康控制源的多个维度:现有三因素和新四因素模型的有序因子分析和交叉验证。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Aug 12;11:114. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-114.