• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移动乳腺筛查:影响参与率的因素、提高响应率和可接受性的努力。

Mobile breast screening: factors affecting uptake, efforts to increase response and acceptability.

作者信息

Haiart D C, McKenzie L, Henderson J, Pollock W, McQueen D V, Roberts M M, Forrest A P

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh.

出版信息

Public Health. 1990 Jul;104(4):239-47. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(05)80472-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0033-3506(05)80472-x
PMID:2382005
Abstract

In 1986, a breast screening project was set up to assess the feasibility of mobile breast screening in rural areas near Edinburgh. Secondary objectives included a study of factors affecting uptake, ways in which uptake might be encouraged and a study of the acceptability of this form of screening. This paper deals with the results of studies dealing with secondary objectives. We found that response rates to opportunistic screening was poor, 5,631 attenders out of 23,229 eligible women (24.2%). This was especially so in older women. Distance proved to be the single most significant factor affecting uptake, but car and house ownership were also highly significantly correlated with response. Leaflet drops had no demonstrable effect on response, but personal invitation by general practitioners produced a 75% response rate in women 50-64 who had failed to attend on the van's previous visit. Attenders found this form of screening both convenient and acceptable.

摘要

1986年,设立了一项乳房筛查项目,以评估在爱丁堡附近农村地区开展流动乳房筛查的可行性。次要目标包括研究影响参与率的因素、鼓励参与的方式以及对这种筛查形式可接受性的研究。本文论述了有关次要目标研究的结果。我们发现,机会性筛查的响应率很低,23229名符合条件的女性中只有5631人参与(24.2%)。老年女性尤其如此。事实证明,距离是影响参与率的最显著单一因素,但拥有汽车和房屋也与响应率高度显著相关。发放传单对响应率没有明显影响,但全科医生亲自邀请使50 - 64岁、上次未能乘坐筛查车参与筛查的女性的响应率达到了75%。参与筛查者认为这种筛查形式既方便又可接受。

相似文献

1
Mobile breast screening: factors affecting uptake, efforts to increase response and acceptability.移动乳腺筛查:影响参与率的因素、提高响应率和可接受性的努力。
Public Health. 1990 Jul;104(4):239-47. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(05)80472-x.
2
Can Flemish women in semi-rural areas be motivated to attend organized breast cancer screening?半农村地区的佛兰芒女性会被激励去参加有组织的乳腺癌筛查吗?
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1999 Apr;47(2):119-27.
3
A mobile breast screening project in Scotland: lessons learned for national screening.
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1990 Jul-Sep;5(3):201-13. doi: 10.1002/hpm.4740050305.
4
Improving the uptake of breast screening: one initiative in east London.提高乳腺癌筛查的参与率:伦敦东部的一项举措。
Public Health. 1996 Sep;110(5):305-6. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(96)80094-1.
5
The effect of access factors on breast screening attendance on two Scottish islands.获取因素对苏格兰两个岛屿乳腺癌筛查参与率的影响。
Health Bull (Edinb). 1997 Sep;55(5):316-21.
6
Do women who intermittently attend breast screening differ from those who attend every invitation and those who never attend?间歇性参加乳房筛查的女性与每次都接受邀请参加筛查的女性以及从不参加筛查的女性有何不同?
J Med Screen. 2014 Jun;21(2):98-103. doi: 10.1177/0969141314533677. Epub 2014 May 6.
7
Prospective study of predictors of attendance for breast screening in inner London.伦敦市中心区乳腺癌筛查就诊预测因素的前瞻性研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994 Feb;48(1):65-73. doi: 10.1136/jech.48.1.65.
8
Improving uptake in non-attenders of breast screening: selective use of second appointment.提高未参加乳腺癌筛查者的筛查参与率:选择性使用第二次预约。
J Med Screen. 1998;5(2):69-72. doi: 10.1136/jms.5.2.69.
9
A comparison of interpretation of screening mammograms by a radiographer, a doctor and a radiologist: results and implications.放射技师、医生和放射科医生对乳腺筛查钼靶照片解读的比较:结果与启示
Br J Clin Pract. 1991 Spring;45(1):43-5.
10
Factors affecting women's response to an invitation to attend for a second breast cancer screening examination.影响女性对第二次乳腺癌筛查检查邀请反应的因素。
Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Aug;41(349):320-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Are caregiving responsibilities associated with non-attendance at breast screening?照顾责任是否与不参加乳腺癌筛查有关?
BMC Public Health. 2010 Dec 3;10:749. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-749.
2
Socioeconomic deprivation, travel distance, location of service, and uptake of breast cancer screening in North Derbyshire, UK.英国北德比郡的社会经济剥夺、出行距离、服务地点与乳腺癌筛查的接受情况
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Mar;60(3):208-12. doi: 10.1136/jech.200X.038398.
3
Identifying geographic disparities in the early detection of breast cancer using a geographic information system.
使用地理信息系统识别乳腺癌早期检测中的地理差异。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Jan;3(1):A10. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
4
Volume of clinical activity in hospitals and healthcare outcomes, costs, and patient access.医院临床活动量与医疗保健结果、成本及患者就医机会
Qual Health Care. 1997 Jun;6(2):109-14. doi: 10.1136/qshc.6.2.109.
5
Psychological predictors of attendance at annual breast screening examinations.年度乳房筛查检查参与率的心理预测因素。
Br J Cancer. 1998 Jun;77(11):2014-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.335.
6
Recruitment activities and sociodemographic factors that predict attendance at a mammographic screening program.预测参加乳腺钼靶筛查项目的招募活动和社会人口学因素。
Am J Public Health. 1994 Oct;84(10):1655-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.10.1655.
7
Women and breast cancer: is it really possible for the public to be well informed?女性与乳腺癌:公众真的有可能充分了解相关信息吗?
CMAJ. 1992 Jun 15;146(12):2147-8.