Suppr超能文献

标准与延长时间滴注多利培南治疗革兰氏阴性感染。

Standard versus prolonged doripenem infusion for treatment of gram-negative infections.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Oakwood Hospital and Medical Center, Dearborn, MI, USA.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Jul-Aug;47(7-8):999-1006. doi: 10.1345/aph.1S032. Epub 2013 Jul 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Doripenem is the most recently introduced carbapenem, with a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity. Preliminary data indicated that activity is optimized by maximizing the time that serum concentration remains above the minimum inhibitory concentration; however, limited clinical data are available to support this approach.

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical outcomes before and after implementation of a hospital-wide initiative extending the duration of infusion for doripenem from 1 hour (standard) to 4 hours (prolonged).

METHODS

This retrospective, quasi-experimental study compared clinical outcomes associated with doripenem administered as a 1-hour infusion versus a 4-hour infusion for treatment of suspected or documented infections caused by gram-negative organisms. Outcomes were assessed for the entire cohort, as well as for the subpopulation of patients admitted to the intensive care unit.

RESULTS

Two hundred patients were included; 106 patients received doripenem via standard infusion and 94 patients via prolonged infusion. No significant differences were noted between the treatment groups in clinical success, length of stay, or duration of treatment when the entire cohort was evaluated. In the critically ill subgroup, pneumonia, standard-infusion doripenem, and concomitant bacteremia were independent predictors of clinical failure (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI] 7.8 [2.4-25.6], 5.5 [1.6-18.7], and 7.0 [1.6-31.3], respectively). Additionally, critically ill patients who received doripenem via standard infusion were significantly more likely to experience recurrence of infection or death within 90 days. No significant differences were noted in length of stay or duration of bacteremia.

CONCLUSIONS

The duration of infusion did not significantly impact outcomes when the entire cohort was compared; however, prolonged infusion of doripenem was associated with significantly improved clinical outcomes among critically ill patients. These findings support the use of prolonged infusion of doripenem for critically ill patients.

摘要

背景

多利培南是最近推出的一种碳青霉烯类抗生素,具有广谱的抗菌活性。初步数据表明,通过最大限度地延长血清浓度高于最低抑菌浓度的时间,可以优化其活性;然而,目前可用的临床数据有限,无法支持这种方法。

目的

比较在全院范围内实施延长多利培南输注时间从 1 小时(标准)至 4 小时(延长)的方案前后的临床结局。

方法

这项回顾性、准实验研究比较了将多利培南以 1 小时输注与 4 小时输注用于治疗革兰氏阴性菌引起的疑似或确诊感染的临床结局。对整个队列以及入住重症监护病房的亚组患者进行了评估。

结果

共纳入 200 例患者,106 例患者接受标准输注多利培南,94 例患者接受延长输注多利培南。当评估整个队列时,两组在临床成功率、住院时间或治疗持续时间方面均无显著差异。在重症亚组中,肺炎、标准输注多利培南和同时发生菌血症是临床失败的独立预测因素(校正比值比[95%CI]分别为 7.8[2.4-25.6]、5.5[1.6-18.7]和 7.0[1.6-31.3])。此外,接受标准输注多利培南的重症患者在 90 天内再次发生感染或死亡的风险显著增加。住院时间或菌血症持续时间无显著差异。

结论

当比较整个队列时,输注时间的长短对结局无显著影响;然而,延长多利培南输注时间与重症患者的临床结局显著改善相关。这些发现支持对重症患者使用延长输注多利培南的方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验