University of Science and Technology of China, China.
Public Underst Sci. 2014 May;23(4):366-75. doi: 10.1177/0963662512445012. Epub 2012 May 10.
For several decades scholars have studied media reporting on scientific issues that involve controversy. Most studies so far have focused on the western world. This article tries to broaden the perspective by considering China and comparing it to a western country. A content analysis of newspaper coverage of vaccination issues in the UK and China shows, first, that the government-supported 'mainstream position' dominates the Chinese coverage while the British media frequently refer to criticism and controversy. Second, scientific expertise in the British coverage is represented by experts from the health and science sector but by experts from health agencies in the Chinese coverage. These results are discussed with respect to implications for risk communication and scientists' involvement in public communication.
几十年来,学者们一直在研究涉及争议的科学问题的媒体报道。到目前为止,大多数研究都集中在西方世界。本文试图通过研究中国并将其与西方国家进行比较来拓宽视角。对英国和中国报纸对疫苗接种问题报道的内容分析表明,首先,政府支持的“主流立场”主导了中国的报道,而英国媒体经常提到批评和争议。其次,英国报道中的科学专业知识由来自卫生和科学部门的专家来代表,而中国报道中的科学专业知识则由卫生机构的专家来代表。本文将结合风险沟通和科学家参与公共沟通的影响来讨论这些结果。