Speers Tammy, Lewis Justin
Cardiff School of Journalism, Media & Cultural Studies, Cardiff University, Wales, UK.
Commun Med. 2004;1(2):171-81. doi: 10.1515/come.2004.1.2.171.
The MMR vaccine became front-page news in early February 2002, in a much reported controversy about alleged links between MMR and autism. We examine both media content and public opinion and knowledge to explore how this controversy was presented, and, in turn, how this coverage influenced public perceptions. The news coverage of MMR was monitored over a seven and a half month period from 28 January to 15 September, 2002. Two national surveys were conducted-in April and in October, 2002-both based on over 1000 face to face interviews, with the purpose of exploring what the public learned from the coverage, and how this information may have influenced attitudes towards the vaccine. We will argue that the media's critical scrutiny of those supporting MMR was not matched by a rigorous examination of the case against it, and that the public was, as a consequence, often misinformed about the level of risk involved.
2002年2月初,麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹(MMR)疫苗成为头版新闻,当时有诸多报道称MMR与自闭症之间存在所谓的联系,引发了争议。我们研究了媒体内容以及公众舆论和知识,以探究这一争议是如何呈现的,进而探究这种报道是如何影响公众认知的。从2002年1月28日至9月15日的七个半月时间里,对MMR的新闻报道进行了监测。2002年4月和10月进行了两项全国性调查,均基于1000多次面对面访谈,目的是探究公众从报道中学到了什么,以及这些信息可能如何影响对该疫苗的态度。我们将论证,媒体对支持MMR者的批判性审视,并未与对反对MMR的情况进行的严格审查相匹配,结果公众经常被误导,对所涉风险程度了解错误。