Suppr超能文献

一种通过计算机断层扫描估算肾体积的简单方法。

A simple method to estimate renal volume from computed tomography.

作者信息

Breau Rodney H, Clark Edward, Bruner Bryan, Cervini Patrick, Atwell Thomas, Knoll Greg, Leibovich Bradley C

机构信息

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON; ; Division of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa ON;

出版信息

Can Urol Assoc J. 2013 May-Jun;7(5-6):189-92. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.1338.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Renal parenchymal volume can be used clinically to estimate differential renal function. Unfortunately, conventional methods to determine renal volume from computed tomography (CT) are time-consuming or difficult due to software limitations. We evaluated the accuracy of simple renal measurements to estimate renal volume as compared with estimates made using specialized CT volumetric software.

METHODS

We reviewed 28 patients with contrast-enhanced abdominal CT. Using a standardized technique, one urologist and one urology resident independently measured renal length, lateral diameter and anterior-posterior diameter. Using the ellipsoid method, the products of the linear measurements were compared to 3D volume measurements made by a radiologist using specialized volumetric software.

RESULTS

LINEAR KIDNEY MEASUREMENTS WERE HIGHLY CONSISTENT BETWEEN THE UROLOGIST AND THE UROLOGY RESIDENT (INTRACLASS CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS: 0.97 for length, 0.96 for lateral diameter, and 0.90 for anterior-posterior diameter). Average renal volume was 170 (SD: 36) cm(3) using the ellipsoid method compared with 186 (SD 37) cm(3) using volumetric software, for a mean absolute bias of -15.2 (SD 15.0) cm(3) and a relative volume bias of -8.2% (p < 0.001). Thirty-one of 56 (55.3%) estimated volumes were within 10% of the 3D measured volume and 54 of 56 (96.4%) were within 30%.

CONCLUSION

Renal volume can be easily approximated from contrast-enhanced CT scans using the ellipsoid method. These findings may obviate the need for 3D volumetric software analysis in certain cases. Prospective validation is warranted.

摘要

引言

肾实质体积可在临床上用于评估肾功能差异。遗憾的是,由于软件限制,利用计算机断层扫描(CT)确定肾脏体积的传统方法耗时或存在困难。我们评估了简单肾脏测量估计肾脏体积的准确性,并与使用专门的CT容积软件得出的估计值进行比较。

方法

我们回顾了28例接受腹部增强CT检查的患者。采用标准化技术,一名泌尿外科医生和一名泌尿外科住院医师独立测量肾脏的长度、横径和前后径。使用椭球体法,将线性测量的乘积与放射科医生使用专门容积软件进行的三维体积测量结果进行比较。

结果

泌尿外科医生和泌尿外科住院医师之间的线性肾脏测量结果高度一致(组内相关系数:长度为0.97,横径为0.96,前后径为0.90)。使用椭球体法得出的平均肾脏体积为170(标准差:36)cm³,而使用容积软件得出的平均肾脏体积为186(标准差37)cm³,平均绝对偏差为-15.2(标准差15.0)cm³,相对体积偏差为-8.2%(p<0.001)。56个估计体积中有31个(55.3%)在三维测量体积的10%以内,56个中有54个(96.4%)在30%以内。

结论

使用椭球体法可轻松从腹部增强CT扫描中近似得出肾脏体积。这些发现可能使某些情况下无需进行三维容积软件分析。有必要进行前瞻性验证。

相似文献

1
A simple method to estimate renal volume from computed tomography.
Can Urol Assoc J. 2013 May-Jun;7(5-6):189-92. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.1338.
2
Measuring stone volume - three-dimensional software reconstruction or an ellipsoid algebra formula?
BJU Int. 2014 Apr;113(4):610-4. doi: 10.1111/bju.12456. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
3
Approximation of head and neck cancer volumes in contrast enhanced CT.
Cancer Imaging. 2015 Sep 29;15:16. doi: 10.1186/s40644-015-0051-3.
5
Intra- and inter-observer variability of functional MR urography (fMRU) assessment in children.
Pediatr Radiol. 2016 May;46(5):666-73. doi: 10.1007/s00247-015-3532-4. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
8
Automated renal cortical volume measurement for assessment of renal function in patients undergoing radical nephrectomy.
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2017 Dec;21(6):1124-1130. doi: 10.1007/s10157-017-1404-y. Epub 2017 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Ultrasonography and MicroCT Imaging for Organ Size Evaluation in Mice.
J Imaging. 2025 Jun 18;11(6):200. doi: 10.3390/jimaging11060200.
2
Development and Validation of a 3D Resnet Model for Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.
J Imaging Inform Med. 2024 Apr;37(2):679-687. doi: 10.1007/s10278-023-00938-2. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
3
Non-contrast low-dose CT can be used for volumetry of ADPKD.
BMC Nephrol. 2023 Oct 26;24(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12882-023-03359-z.
9
Rapid Segmentation of Renal Tumours to Calculate Volume Using 3D Interpolation.
J Digit Imaging. 2021 Apr;34(2):351-356. doi: 10.1007/s10278-020-00416-z. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Renal volumetric analysis: a new paradigm in renal mass treatment assessment.
J Endourol. 2013 Mar;27(3):361-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0195. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
2
Renal measurements on CT angiograms: correlation with graft function at living donor renal transplantation.
Radiology. 2012 Oct;265(1):151-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112338. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
4
Relationship among total kidney volume, renal function and age.
J Urol. 2012 Jan;187(1):344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.005. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
6
Measurement of renal dimensions in vivo: A critical appraisal.
Indian J Urol. 2011 Apr;27(2):169-75. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.82832.
7
Noninvasive and direct measures of kidney size in kidney donors.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2011 Aug;58(2):266-71. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.02.392. Epub 2011 May 20.
8
Size does matter: donor renal volume predicts recipient function following live donor renal transplantation.
J Urol. 2011 Feb;185(2):605-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.098. Epub 2010 Dec 18.
9
Differential renal function estimation using computerized tomography based renal parenchymal volume measurement.
J Urol. 2010 Jun;183(6):2289-93. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.024. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
10
(99m)Tc-DTPA dynamic SPECT and CT volumetry for measuring split renal function in live kidney donors.
Ann Nucl Med. 2010 Apr;24(3):189-95. doi: 10.1007/s12149-010-0349-y. Epub 2010 Mar 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验