Suppr超能文献

定量感觉测试中的重测研究:批判性回顾。

Test-retest studies in quantitative sensory testing: a critical review.

机构信息

Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Neuroscience Center, Copenhagen University Hospitals, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Sep;57(8):957-63. doi: 10.1111/aas.12150. Epub 2013 Jul 4.

Abstract

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) investigates the graded psychophysical response to controlled thermal, mechanical, electrical or chemical stimuli, allowing quantification of clinically relevant perception and pain thresholds. The methods are ubiquitously used in experimental and clinical pain research, and therefore, the need for uniform assessment procedures has been emphasised. However, varying consistency and transparency in the statistical methodology seem to occur in the QST literature. Sixteen publications, evaluating aspects of QST variability, from 2010 to 2012, were critically reviewed in detail. A considerable heterogeneity in the statistical evaluations of test-retest data was demonstrated. The authors, using a secondary analysis of published data for didactic purposes, propose and present minimal requirements for reporting of test-retest QST data.

摘要

定量感觉测试(QST)用于研究对受控的热、机械、电或化学刺激的分级心理物理反应,允许对临床相关的感知和疼痛阈值进行量化。该方法在实验和临床疼痛研究中被广泛使用,因此需要统一的评估程序。然而,在 QST 文献中似乎存在统计方法学的一致性和透明度方面的差异。从 2010 年到 2012 年,对 16 篇评估 QST 变异性方面的出版物进行了详细的批判性审查。研究结果表明,在对测试-再测试数据的统计评估中存在相当大的异质性。作者使用二次分析已发表的数据,提出并介绍了报告测试-再测试 QST 数据的最低要求。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验