Department of International Health, Immunology, and Microbiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Microbiology 9301, Juliane Mariesvej 22, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Trends Microbiol. 2013 Sep;21(9):466-74. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2013.06.002. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
Bacteria can grow and proliferate either as single, independent cells or organized in aggregates commonly referred to as biofilms. When bacteria succeed in forming a biofilm within the human host, the infection often becomes very resistant to treatment and can develop into a chronic state. Biofilms have been studied for decades using various in vitro models, but it remains debatable whether such in vitro biofilms actually resemble in vivo biofilms in chronic infections. In vivo biofilms share several structural characteristics that differ from most in vitro biofilms. Additionally, the in vivo experimental time span and presence of host defenses differ from chronic infections and the chemical microenvironment of both in vivo and in vitro biofilms is seldom taken into account. In this review, we discuss why the current in vitro models of biofilms might be limited for describing infectious biofilms, and we suggest new strategies for improving this discrepancy.
细菌可以作为单个独立的细胞生长和繁殖,也可以在通常被称为生物膜的聚集体中生长和繁殖。当细菌在人体宿主中成功形成生物膜时,感染往往非常难以治疗,并可能发展成慢性状态。几十年来,人们一直在使用各种体外模型研究生物膜,但仍然存在争议的是,这种体外生物膜实际上是否类似于慢性感染中的体内生物膜。体内生物膜具有一些结构特征,与大多数体外生物膜不同。此外,体内实验的时间跨度和宿主防御与慢性感染不同,并且很少考虑体内和体外生物膜的化学微环境。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了为什么当前的体外生物膜模型可能限制了对感染性生物膜的描述,并且我们提出了改善这种差异的新策略。