Suppr超能文献

存档的新生儿干血斑样本可用于准确的全基因组和外显子靶向下一代测序。

Archived neonatal dried blood spot samples can be used for accurate whole genome and exome-targeted next-generation sequencing.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Immunology and Genetics, Statens Serum Institut, Artillerivej, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Mol Genet Metab. 2013 Sep-Oct;110(1-2):65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Jun 13.

Abstract

Dried blood spot samples (DBSS) have been collected and stored for decades as part of newborn screening programmes worldwide. Representing almost an entire population under a certain age and collected with virtually no bias, the Newborn Screening Biobanks are of immense value in medical studies, for example, to examine the genetics of various disorders. We have previously demonstrated that DNA extracted from a fraction (2×3.2mm discs) of an archived DBSS can be whole genome amplified (wgaDNA) and used for accurate array genotyping. However, until now, it has been uncertain whether wgaDNA from DBSS can be used for accurate whole genome sequencing (WGS) and exome sequencing (WES). This study examined two individuals represented by three different types of samples each: whole-blood (reference samples), 3-year-old DBSS spotted with reference material (refDBSS), and 27- to 29-year-old archived neonatal DBSS (neoDBSS) stored at -20°C in the Danish Newborn Screening Biobank. The reference samples were genotyped using an Illumina Omni2.5M array, and all samples were sequenced on a HighSeq2000 Paired-End flow cell. First, we compared the array single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype data to the single nucleotide variation (SNV) calls from the WGS and WES SNV calls. We also compared the WGS and WES reference sample SNV calls to the DBSS SNV calls. The overall performance of the archived DBSS was similar to the whole blood reference sample. Plotting the error rates relative to coverage revealed that the error rates of DBSS were similar to that of their reference samples. SNVs called with a coverage<×8 had error rates between 1.5 and 35%, whereas the error rates of SNVs called with a coverage≥8 were <1.5%. In conclusion, the wgaDNA amplified from both new and old neonatal DBSS perform as well as their whole-blood reference samples with regards to error rates, strongly indicating that neonatal DBSS collected shortly after birth and stored for decades comprise an excellent resource for NGS studies of disease.

摘要

干血斑样本(DBS)已被收集和储存数十年,作为全球新生儿筛查计划的一部分。这些样本几乎代表了特定年龄段的整个人口,并且采集时几乎没有偏见,因此新生儿筛查生物库在医学研究中具有巨大的价值,例如,用于研究各种疾病的遗传学。我们之前已经证明,可以从存档的 DBS 中提取一部分(2×3.2mm 圆盘)的 DNA 进行全基因组扩增(wgaDNA),并用于准确的阵列基因分型。然而,到目前为止,还不确定 DBS 的 wgaDNA 是否可用于准确的全基因组测序(WGS)和外显子组测序(WES)。本研究检查了两个人,他们代表了三种不同类型的样本:全血(参考样本)、用参考材料点样的 3 岁 DBS(refDBSS)和 -20°C 储存的 27-29 岁新生儿 DBS(neoDBSS)存档于丹麦新生儿筛查生物库中。参考样本使用 Illumina Omni2.5M 阵列进行基因分型,所有样本均在 HighSeq2000 Paired-End 流动池上进行测序。首先,我们将 SNP 基因分型数据与 WGS 和 WES 的单核苷酸变异(SNV)调用以及 WGS 和 WES 参考样本 SNV 调用进行比较。我们还将 WGS 和 WES 参考样本的 SNV 调用与 DBS 的 SNV 调用进行了比较。存档 DBS 的整体性能与全血参考样本相似。相对于覆盖范围绘制错误率显示,DBS 的错误率与参考样本相似。覆盖度<×8 的 SNV 调用的错误率在 1.5%至 35%之间,而覆盖度≥8 的 SNV 调用的错误率<1.5%。总之,从新的和旧的新生儿 DBS 中扩增的 wgaDNA 在错误率方面与全血参考样本一样出色,这强烈表明在出生后不久收集并储存数十年的新生儿 DBS 是疾病 NGS 研究的极好资源。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验