Department of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Acad Radiol. 2013 Aug;20(8):987-94. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.03.012.
To determine the accuracy of three-dimensional k-t broad-use linear acquisition speed-up technique (k-t BLAST) accelerated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) parameters compared to segmented multiple breath-hold cine imaging.
A multislice cine (steady state free precession [SSFP]) sequence was performed with complete ventricular coverage during multiple breath-holds (temporal resolution 47 ms, voxel size 1.25 × 1.25 × 8 mm(3)). In addition, two k-t BLAST sequences with complete coverage were acquired, KT1 (temporal resolution 57 ms, voxel size 1.25 × 1.25 × 4 mm(3)) and k-t2 (temporal resolution 57 ms, voxel size 1.25 × 1.25 × 8 mm(3)), during a single breath-hold. For comparison of SSFP and k-t BLAST, LV parameters were determined: ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and LV mass.
EF was underestimated by KT1 (47%) and KT2 (48%) compared to the SSFP sequence (53%). All parameters showed high correlation with the k-t BLAST sequences and the SSFP sequence (r = 0.88-0.98, P < .001). The mean relative difference for KT1/KT2 compared to the SSFP sequence was -0.11/-0.09 for the EF, -0.073/-0.086 for the EDV, 0.044/0.051 for the ESV, and 0.085/0.12 for the LV mass.
The use of three-dimensional k-t BLAST enabled a determination of the LV parameters with high correlation compared to the SSFP sequence. EF was slightly underestimated, and LV mass was slightly overestimated.
比较三维 k-t 广用途加速采集技术(k-t BLAST)加速磁共振成像(MRI)与分段多次屏气电影成像在评估左心室(LV)参数方面的准确性。
在多次屏气期间进行多层面电影(稳态自由进动 [SSFP])序列,具有完整的心室覆盖(时间分辨率 47ms,体素大小 1.25×1.25×8mm(3))。此外,还采集了两个具有完整覆盖的 k-t BLAST 序列,KT1(时间分辨率 57ms,体素大小 1.25×1.25×4mm(3))和 k-t2(时间分辨率 57ms,体素大小 1.25×1.25×8mm(3)),在单次屏气期间完成。为了比较 SSFP 和 k-t BLAST,确定 LV 参数:射血分数(EF)、舒张末期容积、收缩末期容积和 LV 质量。
与 SSFP 序列(53%)相比,KT1(47%)和 KT2(48%)低估了 EF。所有参数与 k-t BLAST 序列和 SSFP 序列高度相关(r=0.88-0.98,P<.001)。与 SSFP 序列相比,KT1/KT2 的平均相对差异为 EF 为-0.11/-0.09,EDV 为-0.073/-0.086,ESV 为 0.044/0.051,LV 质量为 0.085/0.12。
与 SSFP 序列相比,使用三维 k-t BLAST 可以确定 LV 参数,具有高度相关性。EF 略被低估,而 LV 质量略被高估。