Suppr超能文献

使用单次屏气 k-t BLAST 的三维磁共振成像评估整体左心室功能参数。

Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging using single breath-hold k-t BLAST for assessment of global left ventricular functional parameters.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2013 Aug;20(8):987-94. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.03.012.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the accuracy of three-dimensional k-t broad-use linear acquisition speed-up technique (k-t BLAST) accelerated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) parameters compared to segmented multiple breath-hold cine imaging.

METHODS

A multislice cine (steady state free precession [SSFP]) sequence was performed with complete ventricular coverage during multiple breath-holds (temporal resolution 47 ms, voxel size 1.25 × 1.25 × 8 mm(3)). In addition, two k-t BLAST sequences with complete coverage were acquired, KT1 (temporal resolution 57 ms, voxel size 1.25 × 1.25 × 4 mm(3)) and k-t2 (temporal resolution 57 ms, voxel size 1.25 × 1.25 × 8 mm(3)), during a single breath-hold. For comparison of SSFP and k-t BLAST, LV parameters were determined: ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and LV mass.

RESULTS

EF was underestimated by KT1 (47%) and KT2 (48%) compared to the SSFP sequence (53%). All parameters showed high correlation with the k-t BLAST sequences and the SSFP sequence (r = 0.88-0.98, P < .001). The mean relative difference for KT1/KT2 compared to the SSFP sequence was -0.11/-0.09 for the EF, -0.073/-0.086 for the EDV, 0.044/0.051 for the ESV, and 0.085/0.12 for the LV mass.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of three-dimensional k-t BLAST enabled a determination of the LV parameters with high correlation compared to the SSFP sequence. EF was slightly underestimated, and LV mass was slightly overestimated.

摘要

目的

比较三维 k-t 广用途加速采集技术(k-t BLAST)加速磁共振成像(MRI)与分段多次屏气电影成像在评估左心室(LV)参数方面的准确性。

方法

在多次屏气期间进行多层面电影(稳态自由进动 [SSFP])序列,具有完整的心室覆盖(时间分辨率 47ms,体素大小 1.25×1.25×8mm(3))。此外,还采集了两个具有完整覆盖的 k-t BLAST 序列,KT1(时间分辨率 57ms,体素大小 1.25×1.25×4mm(3))和 k-t2(时间分辨率 57ms,体素大小 1.25×1.25×8mm(3)),在单次屏气期间完成。为了比较 SSFP 和 k-t BLAST,确定 LV 参数:射血分数(EF)、舒张末期容积、收缩末期容积和 LV 质量。

结果

与 SSFP 序列(53%)相比,KT1(47%)和 KT2(48%)低估了 EF。所有参数与 k-t BLAST 序列和 SSFP 序列高度相关(r=0.88-0.98,P<.001)。与 SSFP 序列相比,KT1/KT2 的平均相对差异为 EF 为-0.11/-0.09,EDV 为-0.073/-0.086,ESV 为 0.044/0.051,LV 质量为 0.085/0.12。

结论

与 SSFP 序列相比,使用三维 k-t BLAST 可以确定 LV 参数,具有高度相关性。EF 略被低估,而 LV 质量略被高估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验