Suppr超能文献

基层医疗患者对直接面向消费者的基因检测的看法、决策、体验及反应:一项纵向研究

Primary care patients' views and decisions about, experience of and reactions to direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a longitudinal study.

作者信息

Wasson Katherine, Sanders Tonya Nashay, Hogan Nancy S, Cherny Sara, Helzlsouer Kathy J

机构信息

Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics, Health Sciences Division, Loyola University Chicago, 2160 S. 1st Avenue, Bldg. 120, Room 284, Maywood, IL, 60153, USA,

出版信息

J Community Genet. 2013 Oct;4(4):495-505. doi: 10.1007/s12687-013-0156-y. Epub 2013 Jul 7.

Abstract

Little is known about the decisions and perspectives of participants undergoing direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT). The aims of this study were to examine the views, attitudes and decision-making factors of primary care patients regarding DTCGT. Their experience of and reactions to testing also emerged during the study. In this longitudinal, qualitative study, 20 primary care patients participated in DTCGT and individual interviews: (1) prior to testing after the informed consent session, (2) after receiving results, (3) 3 months post-test, and (4) 12 months post-test. Interviews included open-ended questions and all transcripts were analyzed using grounded theory, constant comparison methods. Five key themes emerged from data analysis as participants underwent DTCGT and reflected on their decision over time: (1) limited concerns about DTCGT, (2) motivations for testing, (3) expectations of testing, (4) understanding of results, and (5) impact of testing and results. While a few participants expressed concerns before testing, participants were motivated to test by curiosity, gaining actionable knowledge, and altruism. Most were uncertain of what to expect from DTCGT and needed assistance in understanding results. While many reported testing had no significant impact on them, being relieved or pleased after testing was the most common emotional effect. Notably, a few participants made positive health changes in response to testing. Given the paucity of information about primary care patients and DTCGT, this study adds more in-depth information to the emerging research on how such participants' view, make decisions about, experience and react to DTCGT over time. Because uncertainty remains about the accuracy of DTCGT, the response of primary care patients to this testing requires further investigation.

摘要

对于接受直接面向消费者的基因检测(DTCGT)的参与者的决策和观点,我们知之甚少。本研究的目的是调查初级保健患者对DTCGT的看法、态度和决策因素。在研究过程中,他们对检测的体验和反应也浮现出来。在这项纵向定性研究中,20名初级保健患者参与了DTCGT并接受了个体访谈:(1)在知情同意环节后的检测前,(2)收到结果后,(3)检测后3个月,以及(4)检测后12个月。访谈包括开放式问题,所有访谈记录均采用扎根理论、持续比较法进行分析。随着参与者接受DTCGT并随着时间推移反思他们的决策,数据分析中出现了五个关键主题:(1)对DTCGT的担忧有限,(2)检测的动机,(3)对检测的期望,(4)对结果的理解,以及(5)检测和结果的影响。虽然少数参与者在检测前表达了担忧,但参与者进行检测的动机是好奇心、获得可采取行动的知识和利他主义。大多数人不确定从DTCGT中能期待什么,并且在理解结果方面需要帮助。虽然许多人报告检测对他们没有显著影响,但检测后感到宽慰或高兴是最常见的情绪反应。值得注意的是,一些参与者因检测而做出了积极的健康改变。鉴于关于初级保健患者和DTCGT的信息匮乏,本研究为关于此类参与者如何随着时间推移看待、决定、体验和应对DTCGT的新兴研究增添了更深入的信息。由于DTCGT的准确性仍存在不确定性,初级保健患者对这种检测的反应需要进一步调查。

相似文献

3
Understanding and perception of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Hong Kong.
J Genet Couns. 2021 Dec;30(6):1640-1648. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1430. Epub 2021 May 2.
4
Informed choice in direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT) websites: a content analysis of benefits, risks, and limitations.
J Genet Couns. 2012 Jun;21(3):433-9. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9474-6. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
6
Impact of direct-to-consumer genetic testing on Australian clinical genetics services.
Eur J Med Genet. 2020 Sep;63(9):103968. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2020.103968. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
8
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Helping Patients Make Informed Choices.
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2018 Feb 1;22(1):33-36. doi: 10.1188/18.CJON.33-36.
9
Public reactions to direct-to-consumer genetic health tests: A comparison across the US, UK, Japan and Australia.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Mar;28(3):339-348. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0529-8. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
10
Direct-to-Consumer Genomic Testing Through an Ethics Lens: Oncology Nursing Considerations.
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Jul 20;27(4):380-388. doi: 10.1188/23.CJON.380-388.

引用本文的文献

3
Family secrets: Experiences and outcomes of participating in direct-to-consumer genetic relative-finder services.
Am J Hum Genet. 2022 Mar 3;109(3):486-497. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.01.013. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
4
Considerations for developing regulations for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a scoping review using the 3-I framework.
J Community Genet. 2022 Apr;13(2):155-170. doi: 10.1007/s12687-022-00582-3. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
6
Effects of participation in a U.S. trial of newborn genomic sequencing on parents at risk for depression.
J Genet Couns. 2022 Feb;31(1):218-229. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1475. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
8
Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy: Personal utility of a genetic diagnosis for families.
Epilepsia Open. 2021 Jan 19;6(1):149-159. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12458. eCollection 2021 Mar.
9
Comprehension and personal value of negative non-diagnostic genetic panel testing.
J Genet Couns. 2021 Apr;30(2):418-427. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1327. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
10
Public Attitudes Toward Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020 Mar 4;2019:774-783. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

2
Points to consider in assessing and appraising predictive genetic tests.
J Community Genet. 2010 Dec;1(4):185-94. doi: 10.1007/s12687-010-0028-7. Epub 2010 Oct 16.
3
Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: systematic review of the literature on user perspectives.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 Aug;20(8):811-6. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.18. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
4
5
Risky business: risk perception and the use of medical services among customers of DTC personal genetic testing.
J Genet Couns. 2012 Jun;21(3):413-22. doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9483-0. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
7
"It's not like judgment day": public understanding of and reactions to personalized genomic risk information.
J Genet Couns. 2012 Jun;21(3):423-32. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9476-4. Epub 2011 Dec 17.
8
Association of direct-to-consumer genome-wide disease risk estimates and self-reported disease.
Genet Epidemiol. 2012 Jan;36(1):66-70. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20664. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
9
Users' motivations to purchase direct-to-consumer genome-wide testing: an exploratory study of personal stories.
J Community Genet. 2011 Sep;2(3):135-46. doi: 10.1007/s12687-011-0048-y. Epub 2011 May 28.
10
The general public's understanding and perception of direct-to-consumer genetic test results.
Public Health Genomics. 2012;15(1):11-21. doi: 10.1159/000327159. Epub 2011 Jun 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验