Wasson Katherine, Sanders Tonya Nashay, Hogan Nancy S, Cherny Sara, Helzlsouer Kathy J
Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics, Health Sciences Division, Loyola University Chicago, 2160 S. 1st Avenue, Bldg. 120, Room 284, Maywood, IL, 60153, USA,
J Community Genet. 2013 Oct;4(4):495-505. doi: 10.1007/s12687-013-0156-y. Epub 2013 Jul 7.
Little is known about the decisions and perspectives of participants undergoing direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT). The aims of this study were to examine the views, attitudes and decision-making factors of primary care patients regarding DTCGT. Their experience of and reactions to testing also emerged during the study. In this longitudinal, qualitative study, 20 primary care patients participated in DTCGT and individual interviews: (1) prior to testing after the informed consent session, (2) after receiving results, (3) 3 months post-test, and (4) 12 months post-test. Interviews included open-ended questions and all transcripts were analyzed using grounded theory, constant comparison methods. Five key themes emerged from data analysis as participants underwent DTCGT and reflected on their decision over time: (1) limited concerns about DTCGT, (2) motivations for testing, (3) expectations of testing, (4) understanding of results, and (5) impact of testing and results. While a few participants expressed concerns before testing, participants were motivated to test by curiosity, gaining actionable knowledge, and altruism. Most were uncertain of what to expect from DTCGT and needed assistance in understanding results. While many reported testing had no significant impact on them, being relieved or pleased after testing was the most common emotional effect. Notably, a few participants made positive health changes in response to testing. Given the paucity of information about primary care patients and DTCGT, this study adds more in-depth information to the emerging research on how such participants' view, make decisions about, experience and react to DTCGT over time. Because uncertainty remains about the accuracy of DTCGT, the response of primary care patients to this testing requires further investigation.
对于接受直接面向消费者的基因检测(DTCGT)的参与者的决策和观点,我们知之甚少。本研究的目的是调查初级保健患者对DTCGT的看法、态度和决策因素。在研究过程中,他们对检测的体验和反应也浮现出来。在这项纵向定性研究中,20名初级保健患者参与了DTCGT并接受了个体访谈:(1)在知情同意环节后的检测前,(2)收到结果后,(3)检测后3个月,以及(4)检测后12个月。访谈包括开放式问题,所有访谈记录均采用扎根理论、持续比较法进行分析。随着参与者接受DTCGT并随着时间推移反思他们的决策,数据分析中出现了五个关键主题:(1)对DTCGT的担忧有限,(2)检测的动机,(3)对检测的期望,(4)对结果的理解,以及(5)检测和结果的影响。虽然少数参与者在检测前表达了担忧,但参与者进行检测的动机是好奇心、获得可采取行动的知识和利他主义。大多数人不确定从DTCGT中能期待什么,并且在理解结果方面需要帮助。虽然许多人报告检测对他们没有显著影响,但检测后感到宽慰或高兴是最常见的情绪反应。值得注意的是,一些参与者因检测而做出了积极的健康改变。鉴于关于初级保健患者和DTCGT的信息匮乏,本研究为关于此类参与者如何随着时间推移看待、决定、体验和应对DTCGT的新兴研究增添了更深入的信息。由于DTCGT的准确性仍存在不确定性,初级保健患者对这种检测的反应需要进一步调查。